Knowledge Fight - #905: February 26, 2024
Episode Date: March 1, 2024In this installment, Dan and Jordan continue to track the constantly shifting saga of Alex Jones' feelings about Elon Musk. Plus, Alex reports on the passing of one of his great villains, Jacob Roth...schild.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
I'm sick of them posing as if they're the good guys saying we are the bad guys knowledge
and your knowledge fight
Need money
Andy and Kansas
Stop it. Andy and Kansas
It's time to pray andy and Kansas, andi and Kansas. Andi and Kansas, andi and Kansas.
It's time to pray.
Andi and Kansas, you're on the air.
Thanks for holding.
Hello, Alex, I'm a Christian color.
I'm a huge fan and love your world.
Knowledge Fight.
No, no, no, no, no, knowledgefight.com.
I love you.
Hey, everybody.
Welcome back to Knowledge Fight.
I'm Dan.
I'm Jordan.
We're a couple dudes, et cetera.
We're just with the altar of Celine
and talk a little bit about Alex Jones. Oh, indeed I'm Dan. I'm Jordan. We're a couple dudes, et cetera. Where's your bet the alter of Celine and talk a little bit about Alex Jones.
Oh, indeed we are Dan.
Jordan.
Dan. Jordan.
I have a quick question for ya.
What's up?
What's your bright spot today, buddy?
Why don't you go first?
I know what it is.
I mean, obviously, I will say I have a two pronged
bright spot.
The first one, obviously Final Fantasy VII Rebirth.
Yeah.
Finally allowed to play it this morning. Yeah. Man,
that countdown. We were talked about this a little bit last night. Yeah. Yeah. But I
was curious to hear if you did try and play some at midnight last night. No, no. Do you
manage to go to bed? I managed to go to bed. Wow. But that's because that's because lately
I've been waking up at like 435 at the morning. So I was like, Hey, what's the difference between trying to play an hour at midnight
and then passing out because I'm an old man, right? Or a fully rested morning session.
See, there you go. Yeah. That's, that's impressive. I have not been able to do that whenever I've
had games that were coming out. It's rare that I've been in that position, but I'll
play the fuck out of midnight. I'll be up. I'll just be like, yeah, tomorrow's screwed. I'm going to be, I'm going to pull one.
I mean, I think, I think what it is is my, my need for routine to maintain sanity is
so strong that my body literally just shuts down now at like 9 30 10 o'clock.
See, I'm jealous of that. Yeah.
A little bit. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.
Because I can't, I can't muster any semblance of routine.
Brutal, brutal.
I think being married must help, you know, in terms of that. Having someone
else around probably helps with some structure. There's definitely that. There's definitely
that. But also it is like, man, bipolar, you got to have a routine or you will die.
Yeah, I guess so. There's definitely that. But yeah, you're enjoying it. Yes. I love
it. It's great. Everything I want from it it Except maybe the intro is a little bit slow. Mm-hmm, but you know what that's that's the way people work the intro was the last game
It is it is it? You know what? That's what it should have been
Here's what it should have just been a little little previously on I'm gonna tell you something right now. Mm-hmm
This is the problem with
Devaluing writers, you know whenever whenever video games are having two hour long intros,
you know there's no writer there going like,
hey buddy, let's make a prologue
less than a thousand words.
Right, right, let's tighten this up a little.
Edit down, but whatever.
Well, I'm glad you're enjoying it.
Absolutely.
And then the second one is, I was a guest on On brand are the podcast. We talked about comedy special comedy special.
I got to I got to talk analyzing comedy instead of horror.
Although there's a little bit of both. Sure. But yeah.
I have man. I miss punch up. I don't miss stand up.
I miss I miss telling people how the wrong. Yes.
This is how this could be better. This is how you should get my...
I am Jordan Holmes the joke doctor.
Hey man, those who can't do help you with a tag.
Yeah, I mean that was always one of the joys of hanging out at the open mics after like
oh here's how that could be tweaked a little bit to make it better.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
That's always been one of the like bonding things
to just, uh,
And it usually was over a fair amount of drinks. So that also helps.
Absolutely. Yeah.
But that's great.
Things were a lot funnier whenever it's just you getting drunk with your friends.
Yeah. So people can check that out now.
Yep. It's very good. Um, anyways, your bright spot.
I guess, I mean, look, I don't really have a bright spot, but I'm gonna just say it's that it's now freezing in Chicago. And on our last episode, you were
bragging about not having to wear a coat. You are back in a coat today. Back in a coat,
back in a hat, wearing a wearing an undershirt. And I wore long underwear to walk the dogs
this morning. It's brutal. Okay. Well, word on the street is that temperatures are going
to rise. Eventually. Sure. So fire was this the street is that, uh, temperatures are going to rise eventually. Sure. So
Fire was this what the hedgehog the groundhog told us the hedgehog the groundhog day from the
I never remember what is it? Is it if it sees the shadow it's six more weeks of winter
I think so. Maybe it might be the other way around or the other way around
I never remember which one it is
I think the fact that neither of us know kind of suggests how meaningless it is in the first place.
Sure. But it definitely didn't predict that it would be 60 then snow then 60 then 20.
That would be a very strange prediction for a groundhog. Yeah. Very specific. Require
writing perhaps pictographs. Yeah. So anyway, shorts tomorrow. Yeah, says the groundhog. Right. So during today we have an episode
to go over and we're talking about February 26th. 2024. Okay, which is Monday. Right.
And the reason that we're doing this is we're in a little bit of a saga. I think. Okay. And
that is Alex wrestling with his feelings about Elon Musk. Right. Right. So on our last episode,
we saw him going so far as to personalize criticism about
Elon Musk, say that Elon is giving him nothing but satisfaction. Okay. He is the great wrecking
ball against the globalist. Hey, if you want to complain about him, sure, you Pharisees,
you pure than now types, right? I don't want to be sitting here with the grand pause complaining
about how Musk wasn't in the battle 20 years ago
Right, he was really very defensive. Are you about to tell me that we are gonna condense what should be a longer time period of
disillusionment into about an hour
Maybe a day
There's a little bit of a shift we're speedrunning a hatred
Well, you know on our last episode there was little bit of a shift. We're speed running hatred. It's over to you. Well, you know, on our last episode, there was a bit of a,
I kind of knew that eventually this was going to have to be
revisited. Sure.
Because the tide was going to shift a little.
Sure. Sure. Sure.
Not not so much expecting next episode.
But such such as the info war,
comes at you. Allegiances shift.
Yep. All kinds of ins and outs.
So we'll get down to business on this
and some other important news.
But before we do, let's say hello to some new wonks.
Ooh, that's a great idea.
So first, I just paid off my student loans
and can now fund the information war.
Thank you so much, you're an out policy wonk.
I'm a policy wonk.
Yeah, if you say that, I imagine you being like 75.
I paid off my student loans and you're like decrepit.
Like that's when my head, because that's when I'm gonna pay them 75. I paid off my student loans and you're like decrepit. Like that's when my head,
cause that's when I'm gonna pay them off.
Sure.
Those grandpa's who are Pharisees and pure.
Hey!
Next, congratulations,
Zooey and Siddhar on getting engaged
from Zane Lee, The Riddster and Squeaky.
Thank you so much, you're an out policy wonk.
I'm a policy wonk.
Thank you very much!
Thank you.
Next, Glitterbug Churches,
be ties to knowledge fight.
Thank you so much, you're an out policy wonk. I'm a policy wonk. Thank you very much. Thank you. Next, Glitterbug Churches. We ties to knowledge fight. Thank you so much. You are now a policy one.
I'm a policy one. Thank you very much.
Thank you. Next, Dan and Jordan.
We both love knowledge fighting.
Use it as an inspiration from bugs and bam, bam,
in the bibliorex.
Bibliorex. I did it. Right.
Nice. I pronounced it podcast.
Thank you so much. You are now a policy one.
I'm a policy one. Thank you very much.
And you're doing the Lord's work.
And by that, I mean the Lord of the world and darkness.
Just as real as whatever Alex says, the Dan Brown of the right.
Thank you so much for now, Policy Wonk.
I'm a policy wonk. Thank you very much.
And we've got a technocrat in the mixture, and so thank you so much to Alex's, Alex Jones's neighbors,
still uneaten ass. Thank you so much for now, Technocrat.
I'm a policy wonk. I don't like to hype things, but people are designed to hype. I am going to paint
Once a week on air and I'm gonna let callers call in
We'll also take emails and request what you want to see me paint one two three Matt Damon
There you go
Party time I'm gonna get in your guts and the Nazis in my, were thugs that shook people down to a lot of really bad things.
But they did good things too.
We're going to stop dissing the Nazis all the time.
Okay.
I'm thinking about doing some shows too, where I run the whole thing myself, just hit record,
and sit in the dark with just a few candles and candlelight, and talk about the nature of the world universe.
I mean, you know, a big old juicy ribeye, eye folks is as good as, you know, sex with your wife.
I mean, let's just get down to reality here.
I'm gonna go Donkey Kong, King Kong crazy.
In about 45 days, America sucks for all races.
It's over.
Doesn't mean I want to go live,
say in some places in Asia,
where you could off the plane over there folks,
they karate chop you.
Thank you so much. Thank you very much much so we start off on the 26th and
Alex is in a bit of a state okay the first segment of the show there's some
special reports and stuff to play and then Alex comes in right before it goes
out to commercial I'm broke! It's Monday February 26th, 2024.
We are live with our HALO.
Enemy forces have entered the base.
Enemy forces have entered the base.
Stay with us for emergency transmission updates.
Dramatic fucking.
Somebody sell that desk. Somebody sell that somebody sell that goddamn desk now
ah enemies are in the building enemies are in the fucking building see this is
our final transmission we 100% need the the like classic sitcom-esque repo men
are taking shit away during the broadcast yes we need that right that would
be a great visual.
It's got to be there for us. Yeah. That'd be nice. Yeah. So Alex comes back and he's
going to get to some news. But first he has to complain about how the globalists are trying
to kill off everyone in order to create a Superman. But they're not. They're not just
one. Well maybe a couple. Yeah. But they're actually not. Okay. That is not what they're
doing. No. But that's what they say they're doing
Which is interesting interesting interesting?
And the globalists believe that they're using us as mass guinea pigs and out of this
Metamorphosis out of this grand
experiment
That they are on showing
The uber mention or the Superman the fit the fittest will
come climbing out of that pool of slime.
Now, really, they're just a bunch of evil people that hate themselves and hate us
who congregate and organize
into groups, into wolf packs, into piratical assemblages who go out then and basically wage
war on them and freedom, hijack human invention, they sequester it for themselves, and then
anoint themselves the high priest and lords of the earth.
Well, one of those lords, and I'll be talking about this later in the hour, but it's not
the most important news, so I'll do it later.
The fourth baron Rothschild, the fourth baron de Rothschild, Jacob Rothschild, is dead at
87. And I posted some things that weren't too mean on X today
Sure. I'm sorry what?
He was deposed in front of Satan, idols, he liked to post in front of paintings of Lucifer
so he said, hey Lucifer is summoning his legions. There he is with the head Alisher Crowley
Witch, Marina Abranovich and behind him is a famous painting of Lucifer
Summoning his legions. You know, I'd say well, it's you know, maybe it was a Halloween photo. They took
Yeah, I can give her benefit of the doubt you on
With the Rothschilds, it's constant posing in front of satanic regalia and
Eyes wide shut parties and things like that. So that's what they're into. That's
what they do. And so, uh, he's with his God now. Very interesting.
It is interesting. So I, I'm fascinated, but I'm not fascinated by it. But I'm, I'm, I'm
simultaneously surprised and not surprised that you immediately picked up on that Halloween
costume thing. Yeah. Clearly being something something because that caller on Friday had said that
Elon Musk dressed up like Baphomet.
Now it's like, oh, it's Halloween costume.
Halloween costume. And now he's clearly trapping himself in a wait a second. Maybe I should
only worship. Wait, no, worshipping one billionaire is the same as worshipping another.
No.
Also, also, I'm thrilled that Alex didn't post anything too mean on
just that these worships the devil and is now in hell. No. No, no, no. I first off.
Okay. If that is the case, if that is the case, both barrels, there is no such thing
as too mean. No, you work for the fucking devil. I'll say all kinds of mean words to
you sir. Sure. I would say that's fine.
If you're, you know, attacking a demon or something.
But I think saying that someone works for the devil,
the day they die, is maybe a little mean.
If they work for the devil, and you are certain of this,
Counterpoint.
The no!
The devil doesn't exist.
Okay, there is that.
And people aren't working for the devil. They're not demon possessed.
So it's it is mean. See here's what I'm saying. And this is this
is now my new litmus test. All right. You clearly don't believe
in your own bullshit. If you're not willing to call that guy the
seaward on the day he dies. I think Alex is trying to be another
seaward which is classy. I think that is trying to be another C word, which is classy.
I think that's what what he's doing.
And it's it's transparent and I don't buy it. Yep.
So Alex, he called out the Rothschild just a week ago.
So maybe this is. Did he kill him? I don't know. OK. Maybe that's the implication.
I called out Lord Rothschild.
Was it just last week? Said Lord Rothschild, it just last week said Lord Rothschild
you are doomed to hell with the rest of your forces sure not too mean very
interesting why to find that clip matter a little bit forcefully I had no idea that he was so ill. A jolly old shappie. See, 87, that is ill.
Mm-mm.
Yeah, yeah.
My pretty.
So we're going to be discussing that.
Weird noises.
That's strange.
Yeah, I don't know if Alex is tracing some kind of like,
I called it, but he's saying I didn't know he was that ill.
So he didn't, obviously didn't call it.
Yeah. He was just talking shit. Yeah yeah which he does all the time right any
week you could have found him saying some kind of shit about the Rothschilds
probably I mean here's my question right is it so much of a bad thing if you've
got like legions like if you go to if you die and sure you go to hell so the
environment not as nice as you'd like.
Obviously.
The heat, it's a dry heat.
It's a dry heat, you know.
But you got legions, at least you personally have legions.
This is the classic servant in heaven,
king and hell kind of thing.
Absolutely.
And that is, but that is a classic fallacy.
You are not a king and hell.
That is only one thing.
And Alex actually does talk about that a little bit later.
Okay, well, so your thinking is very clearly off. Clearly. But yeah, our apologies also
to a friend of the show, Mike Rothschild, who we would have liked to have on to comment
about this, but time just did not have the time to work that out. But I'm sure he's
gotten a lot of shit. Yeah, no doubt. The aftermath of this.
Yep.
So that's one big story.
Rothschild is dead.
And there's another big story.
It's a pretty big deal.
Dan Bongino got a secret document of the CIA.
What?
Under orders of Obama, who set up a stay behind network.
Dan Bongino.
In late 2016, to target Donald Trump Alex Jones
Roger Stone and 23 others and it said in the larger document that Bunjino was going to release
more of that it's highly classified he's released one page of it what they were ordered by Brennan
CIA director does he have to respect class of B us. Now bumping means harass or attack. And that's what all this is.
They've been bumping me.
Because they think I'll get in a little corner and curl up and pee pee on myself.
Well, I think they've noticed that's not happened with myself or Trump or anybody else.
Just makes us know we're totally right about what criminal scum you are.
No, hygienic people used to call it.
I want to just explain to you, they're bumping you.
Bumping you off.
It means everything from running into somebody in the grocery store to slicing their tires
and suing them to planting drugs on them to bumping you.
You know, bump man, button man, bump you off.
What a nice document.
What a nice document. What a nice document.
All about bumping.
Took us a while, but we got there.
Yeah.
So Dan Bongino didn't release any classified document.
He put up a list of 26 names on his show.
He just had a picture of names.
Looks like something from a fucking notepad document.
It is not from any official CIA release document.
And he just said that this was a list of names that an unnamed source told him that we're
being targeted by the feds.
There's no document.
I have zero reason to put stock into things.
Dan Bongino is reporting, so I'm going to take this with a huge grain of salt.
That said, I wanted to get a handle on what the deal with this bumping thing was, since
Alex seems to give the term a very broad definition.
Seems like it could be anything really.
I went to the Infowars article about this
and they say, quote, in spy speak bumping is,
when a reason is manufactured to meet
with the target of interest in order to develop
a relationship that could lead to intelligence,
the New York Post reported.
Right, right, right.
So it's like an on purpose meet cute.
Yes, but one person isn't aware and it's a setup.
So that New York Post article is what this actually traces back to, which is a post on
Michael Schellenberger's sub-stack, co-written by Matt Taiibbi and Alex Gutentag from about
two weeks ago.
Sure.
Dan Bongino is just re-reporting the story and saying that he has his own sources on it,
but not revealing anything new.
The article also has no document underlying it and is based on quote multiple credit credible sources who
go anonymous in the article. I find that wording a little strange. Is it not
enough to say that multiple sources have told you this stuff? If we're supposed
to take your reporting seriously, shouldn't be implied that your sources
are credible based on the fact that you're basing a report on them you think?
So the sub stack article ends with this.
Quote, unknown details about the FBI's investigation of the Trump campaign and raw intelligence
related to the IC's intelligence community surveillance of the Trump campaign are in
a 10-inch binder that Trump ordered to be declassified at the very end of his term, sources told
public and racket.
If the top secret documents exist proving these charges, they are potentially
proof that multiple US intelligence officials broke laws against spying and election interference.
If these top secret documents exist, am I supposed to believe that these documents definitely exist
if the person writing this article doesn't even seem to trust their very credible sources
about their existence? I am going to throw this out at you, okay.
I am willing to accept a like, I'm not 100% sure what's in the documents
because who can be?
Even if you saw them, maybe that was some blacked out shit.
They do that, the gun was crazy.
Yeah, absolutely.
But let me tell you something.
If you go, I don't even know if that shit's real.
I say, go away, sir.
Right.
Go away.
Right.
Be gone.
So the evoking of this 10 inch binder of super secret
documents that Trump ordered declassified at the end
of his term, it smacks a little too much of someone
in Trump's orbit creating a counter narrative to the fact
that he's facing criminal charges for his handling
of classified documents.
Sure.
But I guess they could actually just produce the document
or these sources go on the record.
That could help solidify these claims
But for now we have Matt Taibe and Michael Schellenberger's sub stack that has no proof behind it
And then Dan Bajino talking shit and Alex
Exaggerating that talking shit on his own show for his own purposes. Yeah, man
You can just oh if just if, if you get the ball rolling
and enough people are like there,
then you can just say shit forever.
Yep.
And they just stay.
Mm-hmm.
Like Matt Taimi is, what is he even doing?
What is he doing?
Not sure.
He used to write books.
I remember reading a book of his in the past
and I went, those are words.
I accept them. They were. He still uses words. Yeah, I disagree
Strongly it is it is the strategy that you just got to keep rolling rolling rolling
Fred Durst taught us all about that
He's done it all for several reasons or perhaps just one mm-hmm. Yeah, I gotta have faith in your ability to spread bullshit
That's wise. So there's another story here that Alex has
This is a bunch of bullshit, too
so the Atlantic is
Officially saying that they are not going to let Trump in and that they will do what they claim he did Atlantic
Well, he's
Decertify the election
They've been guided Trump for claiming he did that when he didn't do it. He wanted an investigation to look at it.
Now they're officially saying, if he wins, we just won't accept it.
Not if we think we won.
They run by the globalists.
We'll fight it.
No, no, no.
If he wins, we'll just steal it.
It's all about the arrogance.
Now there's the headline.
How Democrats could disqualify Trump if the Supreme Court
doesn't.
Isn't that interesting?
A lot of things are interesting.
In Trump's cases, the federal ones
that left kangaroo juries, I bet you
a billion dollars, which I don't have, of course,
that they will never even allow that article
put out by the establishment to be like,
look, they're the ones proposing it.
Or the New York Times article,
months before the election in 2020,
that was John Podesta, the reporter at the big war game,
where they said, oh, if Trump wins,
we're just gonna to disregard it and
have our own inauguration. And that's the end of it.
Isn't that interesting? Isn't that amazing? It's amazing and interesting. So we've been
over it a bunch, but that article about Podesta in the war game wasn't about planning to delegitimize
the Trump victory. It was about exploring what could be done if Trump lost and refused
to leave office. Rosa Brooks, the co-founder of the group in question, the
Transition Integrity Project, said in an interview, quote,
I think a lot of people have this false sense of security, that there exists some magic institution,
that in the event of President Trump doing something in defiance of the law, in defiance of
democratic rule of law, norms would just kind of descend like the gods and
rescue America.
But that's not really how people and institutions work.
So the impetus for creating this project was to really find a way to talk in a more granular
way about the what ifs.
Turns out that was good forward thinking.
As for this Atlantic article, it's not announcing plans for Democrats to steal the election.
This was an article about oral arguments that are being made before the Supreme Court in the Colorado case regarding making Trump ineligible
to be on the ballot. The attorney representing the voters from Colorado was warning the court
that if they didn't make a determination in a timely fashion, they ran the risk of creating
a scenario where representatives in Congress had to quote, choose between confirming a
winner many of them believe is uneligible and defying the will of the voters who elected them. This was a lawyer urging the court not
to delay the decision because the consequences of not providing solid
legal guidance could be a disaster. The House Democrats cited in this article
all expressed a desire for the court to decide because as Adam Schiff said of the
alternative, quote, that would be a colossal disaster. We already had one
horrendous January 6th. We don't't need another the point of this article is not that Democrats are
announcing a plan to steal the election it's reflecting an almost universal sentiment that
the Supreme Court needs to make a decision on this and if they don't shit's gonna be
bad the takeaway from this article is that the court can't dodge this they just can't
do that it's that's the unacceptable avenue. They're going to do that. If they punt and don't make a definitive ruling
one way or another, it will lead to a crisis and there's a huge likelihood
that some states will try to disqualify Trump. It's fucked up to be in a
situation where members of the House are tossing around possibilities like this,
but if they decide to disqualify Trump, it's a completely different legal
question than what Trump did in the 2020 election. It is still, it bears certain superficial similarities, but it's
entirely different. And one of the primary differences is that pretty much everyone in
this case is just saying, please don't put us in that situation, Supreme Court, just
make a fucking ruling. And you'd have no faith that they will, I have no idea. I mean, I am so amazed at,
there's, cause there's two things, right?
It's either the people that have been elected
to be in the places where you elect them
are so utterly incapable of learning anything
that we're just going to watch this happen.
Or they're like, I don't
know if they're doing it on purpose, but they have some sort of motivation that keeps them
from doing anything useful. You know what I mean? Like it's because it's either you
haven't learned anything over the past my entire life, or you're like, this is great
and I'll die before there are consequences for it, right? I don't know. I think that the ideal situation is have something to point to,
right? Like the Supreme Court decision, if there is a decision, then we all abide by that and we
have to listen to that. So it's not wanting to take the, right, the heat for making that decision
either way. So the court comes back and says like, is up to the states. Right. Then they're fucked. Right. But like that's what
I'm saying. Like you understand learning. Well, but this is not the first time we've
been here. If you read the article in the Atlantic, the people who are talking to them
like Jamie Raskin are saying things like we might have to do this. Right. So there is
some reflection of some learning. Well, let's find out.
Let's, here's what we're gonna do.
I'm gonna root for people being able to learn.
I'm gonna defy expectations, I'm gonna buck trends.
Can I ask you a question?
Sure.
And here's a court of vodka.
What are the ways to learn?
Ooh, I'm gonna need all of this, baby.
So the other question that I have is that, What are the ways to learn? Ooh, I'm going to need all of this, baby.
So the other question that I have
is that does Alex think that misrepresentations of headlines
are powerful evidence to present in court?
Like, I get that he operates totally
in the sphere of public opinion, but it's hard to imagine
that he actually thinks this Atlantic article or the one
about Podesta would have any relevance
in an actual courtroom.
He's saying, I bet you a billion dollars,
this won't come up in the, of course it won't. Here's and actually you know what let me
throw this out at you right in the Atlantic. They are making a good point. Norms will not
descend like some fury from the gods. Well that's from a different article actually
that's what transition integrity project co-founder who is talking about the war games. All right
just to be clear. Fair enough. Clear clarity, but I think I do also think that
maybe that's an implication that's behind the Atlantic articles are fair enough. Right.
Right. But you know, like people are inevitably if there is a takeover probably just going
to be like when and then just kind of move forward like history.
But if you flare up, sure, it'll be, you know, there could be a possible that But then people may adjust so
What if the Atlantic did it right? How many people does the Atlantic employ?
I'm not sure, but I don't think enough to take over a country. I say probably 750
I think you could do it with 750 if they all were focused. How many people do you think we're at January 6th?
But 750 but only a few of only a hundred of them were focused and determined.
You know what I'm saying?
Right.
They were like slinking through the shadows.
If everybody there had a purpose, worked for the Atlantic.
Okay.
You make an interesting point.
I think that's what'll happen, yeah.
So let's move on to the next bullshit headline that I'll have.
Right.
And then we've got even crazier, more important articles.
Deneig Fever surges 400% in Brazil after Bill Gates'
back gene-editing mosquitoes are released.
Am I reading that article?
Oh, he's a nice man.
I like they give you a shot for a spike protein that makes
your body produce a spike protein.
And it's the audacity of it.
You see, it's actually the audacity like no malaria here
until he releases malaria mosquitoes.
I'm sorry.
They quote go out and mate with the other mosquitoes.
So they can't carry malaria, but they've got malaria
and some weird genetic experiment and then
we get malaria.
Sounds scientific.
That's okay.
He's your doctor.
You didn't know that?
I didn't.
Um, so this dengue fever, not dengue.
Yeah, I was going to say dengue.
Dengue is a city in Vietnam.
I was going to say.
So you can see here that Alex is proposing an idiotic conspiracy theory that genetically
modified mosquitoes are causing an outbreak of dengue fever in Brazil. The reality is that there is a huge dengue fever outbreak that's been
going on there this year with the New York Times citing the Brazilian health ministry
estimate that there will be 4.2 million cases this year. So dengue fever is spread by mosquitoes
and Brazil has been seeing record temperatures and increased rainfall which creates the conditions
where there's going to be more mosquitoes breeding, which creates more opportunities
for them to infect humans.
Pretty much everybody understands that some of this is related to climate change, changing
these patterns.
This is not just a Brazil problem.
There are cases rising in surrounding countries, and we've seen it here in the United States
for the first time in the last few years.
Most cases of dengue fever are very mild
and sometimes you don't even get any symptoms.
However, about 5% of cases become severe dengue
which then has a low mortality rate if it's treated
but if not kills about 15% of people who get it.
Now you enter this problem that mosquitoes
have become very insecticide resistant
and you have a real dilemma.
There's a promising new vaccine,
but that doesn't really help people now.
So obviously one strategy is increased testing,
providing that for people.
Catch it early, be able to provide treatment
so it doesn't become severe dengue.
But another is releasing genetically modified mosquitoes.
A British company called Oxitec has created these mosquitoes
by injecting a bacteria called Wabakia
into the eggs of these mosquitoes. Sure. This has a dual effect of
slowing virus replication in the mosquitoes so the chances of transmission
are lowered and it disrupts the ability of these mosquitoes to reproduce. There's
been promise shown in the pilot launches of the mosquitoes like in Medellin,
Columbia where Axios reported that they saw quote, dengue fee contagion reports dropped by up to 97% from 2022 to 2023.
That's a lot.
Even so, there are plenty of environmental questions that this raises
and the specter of unintended consequences is definitely there.
I think a certain amount of uneasiness about this idea pretty, pretty reasonable.
But what Alex is doing is absurd.
These mosquitoes are categorically not causing more cases of dengue fever to pop up, but that's the impression what Alex is doing is absurd these mosquitoes are categorically
not causing more cases of dengue fever to pop up but that's the impression that Alex is giving
and you know it's just stupid right yeah I get where people are coming from you know but
it's already too late we might as well just full force you like listen, we've already Terraformed. You mean getting rid of these like environmental concerns of unintended consequences?
Yeah, yeah, yeah, I mean listen, look at it, look at all, everything we are is unintended consequences.
When you look outside, this is all horrific unintended consequences.
It's our, we're already past 1.5 C up degrees Celsius, so let's fucking, let's show full force!
Maybe we'll get through to the other side!
Well, you know, you're like we'll get through to the other side.
Well, you know, you're like, you go through the, okay.
So the road runner, right?
Mm-hmm.
Goes through the fucking wall.
Right, this is just painted on there?
The coyote can't.
Right.
Because the coyote doesn't believe.
Okay.
All right, the road runner believes.
That's an interesting philosophical perspective.
Yep.
I think that, you know that in reality you can take sort of a measured look at this and say,
you know, there are some potential consequences that you could see and maybe
those are things that we can deal with. Sure. The alternative is not doing
something that you can do that would save a lot of people from sickness and death.
Yeah. So I don't know.
You know, you got to balance this out and I understand why people would have slightly
different takes on it. Right. I don't understand why someone would have your take on it. What
do you mean? I don't understand the road rudder. Let's fucking go. How is that not a take that
makes sense to people? You know, it makes more and more sense when you think about it. So look, there's all these headlines, they're all bullshit. Yeah. But
we get to the really important piece of information. And that is that Alex is now mad at Elon Musk
right, right, right, right, a little bit mad at okay a little bit now that I've mentioned
it, I'm going to drill back into each stack and great to tell. But first there's this and This is a very important story for everybody the story isn't just about us and
It's mostly about him know yet exactly
What is actually going on oh we know the specifics of what's happened, but we're not sure.
If Elon Musk is behind this, or if it's a ghost machine, employees and people that after he goes by and sees something happening,
and frees it up, it's a big company, big organization. They come back and incrementally put the shadow
banding systems in place. Twitter's being me and it's the first many articles because
I decided to talk about it today. So I told the crew about this morning and they put out
one article that just 100% proves in this one area info wars is being massively censored
on X formerly Twitter. Oh shit. He's censored on X formerly Twitter oh shit
he's now calling it X formerly Twitter oh no no just extra this this
hedgering you know oh this was inevitable it's just it's just so much
like learning man conditional everything about Alex is so conditional! Just like the slightest change in condition will cause a massive change in circumstance.
Yeah, so we have a situation now where Alex is seeing something he doesn't like on Twitter.
And now it's either Elon Musk himself who's responsible for this,
or there's like stay-behind networks of people within Twitter who Elon hasn't taken care of and needs to deal with there's deep
Ex-state and then there's deep Twitter state. It's a whole mess. It's it's it is
factions of within the company and I think that this is such a complex and
Nuanced an important issue that Alex realizes that he can't really cover it without getting his exhibits together
Oh God, we've been observing a bunch of other things going on. This we can prove. And I've asked people that are way more proficient
on social media and tech to investigate it and there's been going on for a few weeks.
They're like absolutely this is being blocked. Or when you put your live show feed up on your own profile,
people are going there to find it and they're burying it.
So only a few percentage of people can actually see the show.
So let's go to ask for people watching on TV.
Let's go to the real Alex Jones channel right now.
Let's show people.
How normally you'd have the live show feed.
You know what? We'll do it later. Let's just stop now. Let's just stop now. Let's just
stop now. I'm not mad at the crew. I'm not mad at the crew. I'm not mad at the crew.
This is this is a big deal. So I need to get the exhibits ready so we can properly display all this
and properly show everyone. So maybe in a couple hours, maybe we'll revisit it again.
Why did you start?
Ah, could how can you start? How can you start and not realize? Oh, I can't continue.
I'm going to talk a little shit. I'm going to get to the end of the road and then I'm
going to be like, can't do it. We'll drive later when the road is built.
Yeah. Or whatever. But of course, that's not what Alex does.
If you go to real Alex Jones on X, I'll show you my phone, excellent.
Oh, there it is. Scroll down, please.
Oh my god.
If you go there, keep scrolling, keep scrolling. A little bit faster. A little bit faster. Not faster now.
A little bit faster now. On our computers, it's able to be seen right now. It'll either go up for
like an hour, we don't touch it, and then it gets pulled down. It's still there, but nobody can find
it. Or it's up for five, six hours, it goes away. Or sometimes nobody can see it. And so that's
another thing that's going on.
It's unfortunate that when you pulled it up, it was there.
So now I don't, the evidence that you're presenting
is counter to what you're saying.
There is that.
But then oh, it disappears sporadically.
Oh, all right.
I don't know.
That's not an exhibit.
I mean, isn't it something about how websites
will sometimes prioritize what shows up on people's stuff
by a val algorithm of a thing? I have no idea, but that sounds like shadow banning.
Yep. It sounds like shadow banning does and turns out that also band.video links banned,
which is appropriate because it's banned on video. It's right. They aren't all video links
of some sort like master Brown with an X. I don't know. I haven't been on it for forever.
Who knows?
I don't know exactly how it works, but I'm sure,
you know what, Alex is convinced that one of the likely
possibilities is that people have been flagging his stuff.
And I think that maybe there is a chance that that is true.
Yeah, that makes sense.
Because his shit is wildly effective.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
So I think that there's a chance that people are just like,
fuck this.
And maybe that's causing some things to be hidden or whatever, but he's a
He's a little bit frustrated about the shadow bank. Oh poor people. What we do know that's going on is
Info wars band video platform
censored by ex users can't post links or send private messages. Now, when Elon Musk took
back over or took it over, what was it? A year plus ago, he said he would bring freedom,
you know, back and I think there's certainly still he has. He certainly himself and that's
not how freedom works.
I'm going to be damaging something very positive about that. But then when he brought me back
on three months ago,
we weren't allowed to do spaces,
we weren't allowed to post Band-Aut video.
It got raised to him, he said,
yeah, we've got to reconnect all that,
there's a lot of connections.
Sometimes the defaults turn back on.
And so Band-Aut video,
you could send the link out for a while.
But now all of a sudden you can't send it out,
and it gives you a notice
saying that you need to go talk to and follow a link so that you can learn how you violated
the rules. This is very scandalous. Band off video links don't work. Yeah, your eyebrow
is raised. I mean, yeah, I mean, yeah, like I don't what is everybody expecting to happen? Well, I mean, I think I can sort of tell you. Okay.
Alex wants to do whatever he wants. I mean, but isn't that okay? Here's here's what I'm here's
what I'm saying, right? So if you are Elon Musk or whatever, and you're like, oh, I'm bringing freedom.
Don't you like flag Alex's account as just like,
we don't ban this guy for whatever reason,
just untouchable.
Spoiler alert, a little bit later,
that is exactly what Alex wants.
Right.
He wants to be on like some list of people
who are immune from any kind of anything.
But that's the idea, that's the whole idea
of bringing quote unquote freedom.
That's what fascism is, is some people get all the freedom.
And other people get zero of the freedom.
And the people that you give that freedom to are people
who are most likely to stub their toe
and start screaming at you.
Absolutely.
Because they're little babies.
Because they're little babies.
And Alex and Elon are essentially identical emotionally.
But you know what the problem with that is what he's now created so many Alex's on Twitter.
That is a good point that like you would have to give it to all of these accounts.
That is true. And then you know that kind of ruins the
exclusivity of it much like the VIP microchips. Yeah.
Where the Mark of the Beast but Elon's neuro link is not.
The idea of a human being not recognizing that you can bring freedom or you can bring
no freedom. You can't bring a little bit of freedom. Yeah, that's not how that works.
But he has for his own account, which is what Alex is pointing out here. Right. He's done
it for himself. Great. Right. But the problem, I think, was that there was an expectation led
by Musk himself that Twitter was now going to be the wiggie wiggie Wild Wild West. Oh,
did he perhaps say something upfront and then not deliver? Yeah. So Alex is confused about
was he just pretending? Definitely. We've seen mass throttling that's been intensifying
the last month or so.
And all the other conservatives
and people and populists, I
talked to see that. So here's
the deal. I've been looking at
this for a while. If you go into
the comments
on the live feed, people are
posting their experiences, what
they've seen.
And there's a lot of things they and There's a lot of things they're seeing a lot of things they're screen capturing a lot of things
They're getting video captures of and so I think we're at the stage here a
Finding how bad the manipulation is on X
Which you know, it's total on the other platform. So it's still what does that mean way more open and free?
You know, let's total on the other platforms, so it's still... What does that mean?...way more open and free.
You know, let's say when Musk took over,
Freedom on there was about, on a scale of 1 to 100, about a 2. Who?
Then Musk brought it back up to, like, let's say an 80,
as 100 being the best, and now it's starting to drop down to, like, 70.
We need to have a discussion about that and find out why that is and...
What changes have been made or is he
doing what Google did 25 years ago where they're open and free at first,
everybody on the platform and it works so great and it's so wonderful and over
time they start bringing in controls until now it's a complete and total
fraud. I mean is that all he was doing was buying it while while Westing it for a
while, kind of reinvigorate it and give it market
dominance and then start going back with all the other tech giants did. I mean, I've said
I'm just giving him the benefit of the doubt that we're going to watch all this very, very
closely. But this is such a complex issue.
Oh, it's not two days ago, you were saying you had nothing but satisfaction from Musk
and now this has been lingering for a while. It's a little weird.
Yeah, he's been researching this for weeks.
He spent a couple of those weeks
right with his nose up Elon's butt.
Pretending to talk to a fake Elon Musk.
Jesus Christ.
Oh my God.
So Elon probably wasn't just pretending
to wanna turn Twitter into Wild Wild West,
but I'm guessing that in the time
since buying the company, he's just learned that there was a reason why
certain things that Alex calls censorship were in place. Unfortunately for him
he's probably learned too late. He told advertisers to go fuck themselves and now
people who paid for their check marks so they could make money off engagement
harvesting are mad that they're not getting paid. It's not a model that's
viable in the long term unless you want to pay out a pocket to run your site so you can let shitheads post nonsense. And now Musk is going to
learn why any engagement with Alex is probably a bad idea. He cracked open the door to let
Alex back on in What Do You Know? Alex ended up finding a conspiracy deep in the company
that he's going to incite people around about why he's not popular enough. I'm just a humble
outside observer, but I would bet that Alex
maybe realized that the shit he did on Friday was a little pathetic, and that his support
of Musk didn't match where his audience was at. This is an attempt to realign his position
with the audience by creating a completely meaningless complaint about Twitter that he
demands Elon fix. This was somewhat inevitable, as I've been saying for a bit. The correct
conspiracy theorist position is not to trust Musk at all and Alex is trying to get right with the game now which David Ike was right
about from the jump yeah and I think that explains a lot of this recalibration that Alex is doing.
I think I appreciate Alex in this regard for one reason and that is because referring back to our weakest link
You know like Alex is just the weakest link of the propaganda chain. It's very clear very transparent. What's going on?
Man when he is making a lesser of two evil arguments It lays bare how stupid the concept is entirely right whenever you like, whenever Alex Jones is making the same, like, no, here's
why you should fucking W is better than no, you're done. We're all done with lesser of
two evil arguments.
I disagree. I disagree with you that I don't think all lesser of two argument evil, a lesser
of two evil arguments is, I don't think they're all inherently meaningless or anything, but
I do agree with you that sometimes they
can be limiting in terms of imagining a better world.
Right. I mean, if you've got Alex saying it, then come on.
Well, I think that it lays bare more how ridiculous Alex's principles are and shit.
Because, you know, in the same way that, like, Alex would never equivocate about someone
putting chips in your brain,
if it wasn't someone like Elon Musk,
who he has a vested interest in,
that principle that should be there is not there,
because he has this, well, he's not as bad
as other tech platforms, and that's not something
that he would, a grace that he would afford
in any other situation.
If there's another billionaire who's putting chips in people.
No, exactly, that's exactly what you're saying.
You know, where I mean, yeah.
If it's a principle, then it's an all or nothing principle.
You can't have a little bit.
You can't be like, hey, listen,
anybody who puts chips in your brain is evil.
Except this guy who puts a few chips in your brain.
Nope, that's not how it works.
It's either all or nothing with this kind of thing. That's your principle.
Yeah. Yeah. I agree. I agree with that for the most part. So Alex is gonna, he's gonna
really get down to the bottom of this. And by the way he's gonna do that is he's gonna
have some meetings with some people about Musk during the show in the breaks, I guess.
I think he's gonna talk to Chase Geyser. That makes geyser That makes it's gonna. Okay. All right. What I'm gonna do is cover all the other news and then I'm gonna collect all this data and
Talk to the crew and tell them what I want to show and
during the breaks have a few meetings and
Then I will do a little presentation on this and and tell you what I really think
coming up at the
Bottom of the next hour what but I was sitting here today thinking you know should I even cover this?
Or should I let it keep developing and just find out more probably the light and I couldn't stop myself I've been noticing about it couple months now, and it's been intensifying and then the out
video
That's that's outright banning that on the platform. The link can't be uploaded. It can't be sent. It
can't be shared. Now you know, the backup of that is Mad Max
World TV Mad Max World TV.
As is a mirror mirror site that you can maybe get links
through. Sure. But here's the here's the thing that I find
really interesting is that when Alex was being confronted by David Ike,
he did say some stuff like this.
That Musk was censoring him on Twitter
or that Twitter was censoring him.
There was some, but it was a throwaway thing.
It wasn't really even that big of an issue for him.
So this idea that he's felt that his posts
weren't getting enough engagement that
I do think probably has been lingering for a couple months or whatever. Maybe his whole
life, but it's incongruent that then he would have this defensive ass spectacle. Yeah, is
before this. Yeah. Yeah. I mean, it is. It is three days before it is fucked up because it is the pattern that
we see all too often of like, sure, in private, I was more than aware of how bad Elon was.
But for public facing conversation, I had to present it as a completely different thing.
How much, how much, that's why you can trust me.
How much different is that than what Alex was even saying on that Friday episode?
He's shit gold and you know like yeah, you know hey, I'm not going to be mad when I get all this stuff out of it
Totally, so yeah, I mean it is even he's saying that publicly which is bizarre and it is it is vacillating
Bullshit to of like oh, I can't believe he's doing that well, but it's better than not have being on Twitter
Ah, but this isn't perfect. Ah, but at least I'm on there. You know like it's ridiculous. Yeah, so you have another bit of news
Blitz sure blitz, but they're just some headlamps. Yeah
and just like that
We accelerate from two minutes to midnight to ten seconds to midnight.
This is the line in telegraph.
9, 8, 7, 8.
Ukraine-Russia war, NATO and EU members considering sending troops to Ukraine.
I told you about a month ago, remember the German Defense Minister said we're getting
ready for a 25-30 year war. The Swedish defense minister said get ready for war as early as next February.
That was just like it.
I guess it was late December.
The British defense ministry said we're going to war with Russia.
I prepared for a national draft.
And now I got a stack of corporate news here just reporting on it like oh hey
Jahira cat was stuck in a tree down the street
And now the New York Times like all the CIA's been there fighting the Russians for at least ten years
Yeah, we overthrew the pro-Russian government and started pushing them damn Russians out killing them
Those bastards tried to fight back now. we're just going to send in NATO
and whoop their ass. We're the good guys.
Okay, so this is based on a really weird comment that French President Emmanuel Macron made
after a recent meeting of European heads of state in Paris.
All right.
Macron said, quote, there's no consensus today to officially, openly, and with endorsement
send troops on the ground. But in terms of dynamics, nothing should be ruled out. We'll do everything necessary to ensure that Russia cannot win this war
Almost immediately pretty much all of the European countries came out and like we're totally not sending troops to yeah, absolutely German Chancellor Olaf Schultz
Tried to clarify quote once again in a very good debate
It was discussed that what was agreed from the outset among ourselves and with each other also applies to the future, namely that
there will be no ground troops, no soldiers on Ukrainian soil sent there
by European countries or NATO states. NATO Secretary General Jen Stoltenberg
came out and said they weren't sending troops. Macron was talking shit. Right. And
as for the CIA thing, the New York Times did just do a big story about the
partnership between the CIA and the intelligence agency in Ukraine, but they
didn't say any of the stuff that Alex is claiming. Right. The partnership was initiated by Ukraine
and happened after the ouster of Yanukovych. So Alex has the timeline completely wrong
and he's just making up details. But yeah, so they're going send troops. Yeah, yeah, you know,
this is one of those times where it is so big
that whenever I, like it is almost,
it's almost like reading about fiction, you know,
whenever somebody's like, ah, the CIA has been working
with the government of Ukraine
since after Yanukovych fell, I'm like,
I live in Chicago.
I have a Walgreens that I go to regularly.
Like I get what you're saying,
but also at the same time,
there's a part of me that goes,
I feel like I'm crazy.
I feel like I'm absolutely insane that I even know that.
That's crazy.
Well, I think that I don't know if there was a reason
that you wouldn't think that.
There's also that.
But it's more a function of providing resources
and collaborating than it is like the CIA is troops
that are there killing Russians or anything.
Right.
If you read that article, there's a lot of wrestling
with the ability to trust the Ukrainian
side that the US agencies had.
And then also wrestling with like, we can't do anything that is going to reasonably, expect
reasonably to cause lethal consequences.
So there was a lot of like going out of the way to be like, we can't do anything
that's going to cause them to. We have to, we have to try and help without helping. Right.
Right. Right. So it's kind of, you know, I don't know. It's, it is interesting and it
is weird to know it. Yeah. But it's not at all what Alex is talking about. Yeah, it is it is one of those things where it feels like
we started off somewhere and then
Somewhere somebody took a little bit of a wrong turn and on the way to being like maybe if we get back on track
We'll go a little bit closer. They just and it just and then now here. We are like 40 years later and everybody is like
boy, I think we got to start all over
You're shaking like a net to sketch. We got to start all over man. Well, that's probably not the best plan either
Yeah, so Rothschild Jacob Rothschild dad dad and I guess he's transcended on to meet his god little G
Is his god association with a jabs Satan love that guy and we go to my
ex account there's some pretty fun little memes from the Simpsons the one where you
look at the mirror and it shows what you look like in hell and of course Mr. Burns is what
this this guy's actually based off of is Lord Rothschild. The creators even admitted that and he looks in the mirror and he's like a king in hell.
So I guess that's the the joke is it's better to
rain in hell than sermon heaven, but you really don't rain in hell.
Do you?
No, see, that was your mistake.
So this is completely made up.
Alex thinks that Jacob Rothschild looks like Mr. Burns and there have been a bunch of memes people posted on social media claiming he's the inspiration for the character, but that is all made up. Alex thinks that Jacob Rothschild looks like Mr. Burns and there have been a bunch of memes people posted on social media claiming he's the inspiration for the character, but that is all made
up. Matt Groening based Mr. Burns on a composite of John D. Rockefeller, the former head of Fox
broadcasting Barry Diller, and his high school teacher, Mr. Bailey. This is a good opportunity
to once again highlight the way Alex takes information that he's either making up or he got
from shithead memes, which he's turning around and presenting his fact to the audience
In in a case like this
It's kind of trivial just about the basis of a cartoon character
But he isn't any less careless with more serious stuff and these these are these kind of great opportunities to be like ha ha a to
Be this is this this is the way you you see truth see now. Here's the thing though. I find this
the way you see truth. See, now here's the thing though.
I find this backwards, right?
This is not at all trivial.
This is about the fucking Simpsons, all right?
See, this is the difference in-
This is some serious shit.
This is the difference in our uprising.
This is don't fuck around shit, right?
I don't give a shit what the CIA is doing in Ukraine.
Don't fuck with the Simpsons, my man.
Seasons two through nine or 11,
depending on what your preference is.
Sure, I grew up not being allowed to watch the Simpsons because it promoted bad family
values. So I missed out on a lot of it and I don't have the same emotional connection
as you do. That's why you know more about the CIA and Ukraine.
I get what you're saying. So Alex is in a bad mood and it's probably definitely because
of Twitter. I'm in a really bad mood right now. So I'm really working as hard as I can
to be friendly and nice and not be too mean. But just while we were in the break, because
I'm not a big ex guy, I don't fair it through all the sub channels and messages and how
dare you. We got a message that I've been flagged for doing something wrong last night.
And so that's why our video was removed.
And then I guess there is a ghost of the machine,
because people that hadn't restarted X could still see it,
and that's why people couldn't.
So X did take down last night's show,
and they will not let us send out the name Bandod video and so
that's the big deal that Elon Musk's operation is doing that he needs to fix
that we need to reach out to folks there and we need to get a statement from him
so this is the new story that's developing it has to do with last night's
show the Sunday show yeah and so that that it has to do with last night's show, the Sunday show.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
And so that will develop as this goes along.
But this is the point where Alex is like,
all right, ah, ah, ah.
I'm coming up with a storyline of why this is happening.
And spoiler alert, it's because he thinks
it's because he talked about Bon Gino's dumb shit
on Sunday's show.
Right.
And so the man is lashing out at him and shadowbanned him.
Because of the 26 names.
Right.
The non-existent document that Alex is calling a document.
Right.
Yep.
So this has to be, this has to be like automatic, right?
The algorithm is just doing what it's supposed to do.
I think.
Because I can't imagine a person working for X being like, well, this will make Elon happy.
Block.
I'm not, I'm not entirely sure.
I think that from what I understand, because I went to the infor's article
about this, there are a number of screenshots that have someone posting
link to Alex's tweet that is the, I guess the live show link or whatever.
Right.
And it'll have the link in the body of the tweet.
And then the link itself will have the text like,
this content is unavailable or whatever.
And I think that is maybe just Twitter being shitty.
Like I don't even know if that's the function
of some kind of banning or whatever.
Cause I've seen that in the case of some people's tweets.
Yeah.
I'm certainly not on Twitter as much as, you know,
and most people.
Yeah.
But I've seen that in the case of some like,
misinformation researchers and stuff that I've,
that I have on the follows.
So like, I don't know.
I think it might just be something that happens on Twitter.
Yeah, well, because it's a shitty he's like, yeah, yeah, yeah.
Yeah, I'm not.
I'm not. I did it and got rid of.
I'm not ready to ascribe some kind of backlash to dumb shit.
But Dan Bonjino said.
Yeah, that's.
Especially if like Dan Bonjino's videos aren't also getting this same thing.
So I don't know. Yeah.
Bonjino, how you how you doing doing buddy? He's doing good. Yeah.
Shit. So Alex runs down some headlines here and then he
needs to self soothe. Of course.
All right. We talk about that quickening but it's so intense
right now I got smoke coming out of my ears. News is pouring in
as NATO puts out through the press they're preparing to
invade Ukraine and go full war with Russia.
And the left is screaming and yelling
and absolutely loving it.
They just want nuclear war.
They want mass death.
There's been so much trouble.
I mean, we are literally in the hands of Satan right now.
Speaking of Satan, Lord Rothschild,
the fourth Baron, the Rothschild,
this made the jump into the fiery furnace.
I guess Lucifer is summoning his legions. And we'll get into that more here in a moment as I promised to in a bunch of other big news.
We have big financial news raking as well. We're getting to the third hour. But first
I love this Viva Vendetta intro. It always makes me feel happy happy so let's just play that then I'll try to calm a little bit. I just you know there are of course those who do not want us to
speak. I need to play some B for Red Dead in a few
better. I mean sometimes when somebody does that in public you know that is I'm
if I'm an adult I wouldn't just put a pacifier in my mouth and start
sucking on it in public.
I'm just saying that I take the train.
Well, there's, um, there's, there's an element to this that I don't know if it is exactly
self soothing.
I think he might just be like, I need to get off air for a little while.
I'm frustrated or it's buying some time or whatever.
Little calm a little comfy.
Maybe, but it does seem weird that the way he's presenting it is, uh, I'm really mad right now. I need to feel better by watching
this. Yeah. Cause that seems like a very, I don't know, childish. Yeah. Yeah. Cause then
the cause that because you've, you've, you've raised the possibility of two things. Either
he is doing this or he wants people to think he's doing that which is crazy.
Or he thinks it's the most sensible explanation. Exactly. Which is weird.
I would prefer people think that I was sitting here with a pacifier in my mouth
than them think that I was going into the back room to take a gigantic swing of whiskey.
Right. Which is fair. Or Tito's.
It could be. So Alex comes back feeling better. Yeah.
But not really. I'm gonna drill into those articles
I'm gonna drill into Trump winning so big in South Carolina the response to that
Why it's so historical that he got double the amount of votes anybody ever got in a primary double what he got in
2000
Double what he got in 2016. I mean this is wild and so much more. And then we've been investigating clearly
the algorithmic throttling and censorship at accents intensifying.
Oh man, still mad. So it is true that Trump got way more votes in the South Carolina primary
than he did in 2016. In fairness, in that race, there were five other candidates, two
of them being fairly viable at that point in the race. He probably could have got as
many votes if it was a one on one situation with a
non starter candidate like Jeb Bush or John Kasich.
If you take the votes from Ted Cruz and Ben Carson and sprinkle in a few from Marco
Rubio, then you have about the same amount as Trump got this time around.
And this is definitely not the most votes anyone has ever gotten in a primary.
That's ridiculous.
Trump got a little over 450,000 votes in the state, whereas people in the California primary
generally get over 2 million.
I guess if Alex met the most votes in a South Carolina primary, that might be true, but
it's not necessarily as huge of news as he's making this out to seem.
Yeah.
Set in records.
Yeah.
But it is a lot.
That's also because of the circumstances we're in.
It's a one-on-one
race with someone who's, you know, I'm always, I'm fascinated by what I read about this because
it, it seems like so many people who write about this are ignoring one very obvious thing
about polls that we're talking about right now, which is that a large amount of people
are voting with the intent of the person they're voting for hurting other people. Like they're
voting for hurt. They're voting for I want this person to hurt others. Right. That's
a bad motivation. True. What's what policy are like,? Trump is gonna be more like a 27% progressive tax.
Like no, no, he's going to hurt people at the border.
He's going to hurt people in the government.
Yeah, but he's going to hurt people.
But people who have the attraction to these policies
that are going to just hurt people
have rationalizations around them.
Like, that he's gonna hurt immigrants.
Sure.
Certainly, but they've rationalized
that there is an invasion of the country.
And so what Trump is doing is not hurting immigrants,
he's helping the country and saving it from an invasion.
Sure, sure, sure.
So it's not, you know, there's ways
to talk yourself into it, not being or about hurting.
Oh, I'm not talking about them.
I'm talking about the other side.
Like, I don't understand why people aren't looking being about hurting. Oh I'm not talking about them. I'm talking about the other side. Like
I don't understand why people aren't looking at that and going, ooh, a lot of the people
who live here want to physically hurt me. I think people might be looking at that way.
I feel like it's not quite, it's not quite we're gendering a serious response. I think
I think people are having a response. Oh boy. Maybe it's not as strong as you would like it to be,
but I think there's a response.
I was gonna get hurt.
So someone at Twitter, bandband.video,
which again is in the name.
Right.
So it seems appropriate.
It is.
If I saw band.video, I'd be like, ban that shit.
Yeah, I mean, it's asking me to ban it,
thereby giving it value. Yeah, but Musk needs to fix this shit. Yeah. I mean, it's it's asking me to ban it there by giving it value
Yeah, but Musk needs to fix this shit
No
Got a Mad Max World TV and those links when you send them out of whatever live theater video you were finding will work on x
Which is important in the info war
We created that because before Band-O video was banned everywhere, but especially on Twitter
Once Musk let me back on for three months or so, it worked.
Now it doesn't work again.
So did somebody go in there and flip some switches?
Did it happen under Elon Musk order?
So we know that's going on.
And so we're just starting to look's going to look into this one exactly is that I'm gonna go off have cocked
but if
Elon Musk doesn't give a reason why band-eye videos been banned or if he doesn't fix it
He doesn't have to make a statement obviously, oh
And I know some of the high level people edX
Whenever I was unable to get turned back on for spaces
And I do that interview with Elon Musk
on Chase Geiser's account.
He said, yeah, there's a lot of stuff
on the back end's gotta be fixed.
A lot of links that have gotta be done.
The censorship's baked into the thing.
Basically, he said Twitter's, he didn't say basically,
he said Twitter was a crime scene.
And so I'm still trying to fix all the code
they put in there to control things that mess things up.
And I tend to think that's the case
Okay, because why would he go do all that and then allow it to be reversed? I think
somebody's game in the system
But you can say well a bunch of bots went and flagged your show last night, that's why it was pulled down last night
Okay, well did bots ban, ban.video? No. That was done deliberately
inside so we have one case of incredible censorship going against what Elon
Musk said that's happening so Elon needs to fix that. And I won't, I'm not gonna
make a big deal about it if suddenly suddenly band I video gets turned back on
We know it was a glitch or something
But if it just stays like that I'm gonna be like hey dude, what's going on man? Oh, that's harsh. Hey dude. What's going on man?
brah
bro, I think that
What's going on is Alex is making a demand of
Musk and yeah, he's creating a scenario where
in he can have a personal complaint to base some kind of breaking with.
But the alternative is also pretty attractive, which is Musk does what Alex wants and then
he has basically made the owner of the site subservient to his whims.
And so that's, you know, it's a win-win for Alex, really.
It's like a pin in a chest, you know?
Doesn't matter what you do, I'm gonna take one of your pieces.
Yeah, you can not respond, and Alex...
Perfect, you're done!
You can respond?
I hate you, you evil monster!
Or at least it can lead down that road.
Yeah.
It's an opportunity to break away from the
clearly off branded mistaken hero worship of must. We thought he was a good guy because
he took over Twitter, but it turns out he was. Oh no. So Jacob Rothschild dad and Alex
plays I have to apologize in advance for the audio of this clip. It is unlistensable
But Alex remembers that Luke Radowski from We Are Change and Tim Poole's co-host now
He at one point in history
Confronted Jacob Rothschild and so Alex plays a clip of that and it sounds like shit
Here's Luke Radowski. This is like eight years ago
Who's done the best peaceful,
friendly, professional confrontations
with globalists I've ever seen.
He's trying to like 300 plus of them.
Try to get Luke on the next few days.
In front of Henry Kissinger a whole bunch of times.
He's just trying to basically anybody
who's anybody in the New World Order.
Here he is talking to the head
of the Rothschild dynasty.
Mr. Rothschild dynasty. Yeah
This is on the note
As far as like conspiracy basis goes
Who's my cousin?
See well that proves everything we need to know right? I, the questions that are being asked are what happened at Bilderberg? I wasn't
there. Wasn't there. What about last year? Wasn't there either? Maybe my cousin was.
Just completely unlistable. Yeah. Can't make out anything that anybody's saying. But it's
in that chunk that the most important stuff. Of it of course it did so actually that's not true the most important thing as it turns
out from Alex's telling of this uh-huh is that he gave Luke a look he gave him a
look and we're gonna hear Alex talk about that let's hear let's hear let's
hear a big BBC interview was more than 10 years ago. He admitted to founding Israel or his dad.
He admitted to the Napoleonic Wars. Can you admit to those that they did the run on the
bank in 1815? That's a battle of water. Lou claiming Napoleon won caused the bank to crash.
They bought up literally. So they they're already the most powerful force in the British Empire.
Then they used a artificial crash they instituted to get control of it.
That they brag about that. That's in mainline history books.
They should brag about that if they pulled it off.
But go to about the last five, 10 seconds where he gives gives Luke a look,
a real Rothschild look, just for a second.
And he's acting real friendly and gentlemanly,
but just for a minute, you see the demon.
He just, for a minute, like,
oh, you see me, sunny boy.
You see who I am, and it's because Luke was polite.
But he also said, perfectly, you have no legitimacy
and free humanity rejects what you're doing and we
will stop you. And Rob's all goes, what? Because they've lived in this world, these globalists,
where they get to do all the stuff to us and then they have the media say they don't exist.
You follow and say, listen, I'm calling you out. I have a damn right to live. I don't
want to be under your control. And he's like, wait a minute, let me get a closer look at you. Let me
right here. Mm. Yeah. A few frames further. You know, one
you get to are we doing a frame by frame video right there
to see when a look of true demonic presence happened? Yep.
Right there. Right there., oh you got me!
So this is the level of shit we're dealing with here.
Jacob Rothschild gave Luke Radowski a quizzical look for a split second and Alex's decided to write a story about how they prove there's a demon inside him.
Otter garbage.
And for what it's worth, Jacob Rothschild never admitted to the Napoleon Bank thing because that's an anti-Semitic fiction that traces back to Nazi propaganda and a bigot pamphleteer who went by the pen named Satan. It's not true, so there's nothing to admit to. Alex isn't, he's
not exaggerating here, he's just lying. As for the founding of Israel thing, Alex is thinking of
Edmund James de Rothschild, who wasn't Jacob's father. Edmund was from the French branch of
the family, whereas Jacob's dad Victor Rothschild was from England. Edmund and Jacob are related through Mayor Amshel Rothschild, who's Edmund's grandfather,
and Jacob's great great great great grandfather, so I have no idea what their familial term
would even be.
Whatever.
Eighth cousin, twice a move or something?
Not related, I don't care.
They're technically related, but it's a distant dish.
So they're all Rothschilds though, Alex.
It's all one big thing.
It's a load of shit.
Yeah.
Load of shit.
Oh.
Mm-hmm.
Boy.
But he gave him a look.
If.
If.
He caught him in that split second, that frame.
If what we're dealing with, spiritually speaking,
is that demons go all
constantine on you if you're polite.
If that's where we're at in this world, I'm out.
I'm out!
It is kind of in line with an exorcism.
You know, like he's basically saying
that Luke would ask you if he was polite and you voked.
The power of Christ compels you,
and therefore you must show yourself to me.
It's a double cane situation.
Yeah, absolutely.
Yeah, you said the magic word.
Absolutely.
No, I mean, I don't know what to tell you if you're gonna, if you're gonna, if that's
what you've got.
That is what he's got.
Fine.
That's what he's got.
Fine.
Okay.
Fine.
You said it's fine.
Fine.
That's what you get.
So one thing you might notice is that also Jacob Rothschild is a baron, a baron to Rothschild.
Right. And so Alex talks about that here.
By the way, for those that don't know, a baron is like the third in charge. So he's the fourth
baron of Rothschild. Fourth baron. Okay. Okay, it still took him a couple decades after 1850 to get that
What so
That's because he wants the legitimacy. Yeah, man
So in 1846 Anthony Rothschild was made a baron by the. That same day, two other people were given the title, Henry Robert Ferguson Davy and Frederick Curie Esquire. Anthony had no male
heirs, so the title was passed down to his nephew, who was Nathan Rothschild. Keep in
mind this is not the Nathan Mayer Rothschild, who's the guy that Alex thinks took over the
stock market with the Napoleon trick. That's this guy's grandson, who becomes the Baron.
Nathan Rothschild got the Baron title, and he's Jacob's great-grandfather
So it passed down the line to him sure Barons are not the third in charge
Alex is just exploiting the fact that this audience has no idea what any of these things mean and they're just blindly trusting the shit that Alex makes up
So he can sound smart. Yeah, there are five titles of peerage for males in the United Kingdom. Sure top to bottom There's Duke Marquise Earl
Viscount and Baron the Baron is the lowest
This right scheme right there is so many fucking Barons to man
It's a third in charge
You know a lot of people have ragged on feudalism for a long time
But now that now that we know how many Barons there are, I think we should bring it back.
Give me a thief!
And now if you even include, like, knights.
Sure!
Yeah, yeah, yeah, absolutely.
They're a little bit above knights.
Give me a GCBGE or whatever it is.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
So yeah, Alex is a little bit off about this baron thing.
Third in charge.
Man.
Fuck out of here
Okay, let me throw this out at you. Okay, if you're a Luke Radowski type
You're fighting against the globalists
But if you've been around
300 plus confrontations with globalists and multiple with Kissinger, which have clearly been very fruitful Then you work for them, right? There's no way you don't work for them. You are in some way their stooge. You're doing opposition PR. Absolutely. Yeah, yeah,
there's cause if you're at all a threat, then you get maybe two or three. Like, most people
aren't talking to me for a second time. Let's put it that way. You know what I'm saying?
Nor Alex. Exactly. But that doesn't mean Alex is a threat either. That means he's more abrasive
and annoying. That's a little bit of a call is polite. And that's how you get the demons.
So look, speaking of that demon, Alex is really obsessed with this split second bloke.
And what they have is an incredible disgust for the public. An arrogance that is just
immeasurable. But that look, just keep rolling that last few seconds in a loop.
You'll consider it's a look of I can't stand you.
I hate you.
You're so pathetic and little.
Look at you.
You pitiful thing.
You don't have a shot.
But I'm scared of you.
That you see what I am and you know what I am.
Just just just roll that last part of look.
Just like every video.
No audio.
Just roll that last part over and over again.
Because right there is everything you need to see.
Everything you need to know.
It's a look that clearly translates to a lot.
It's a speech in a moment.
There's a part of me that is like,
okay, when I say this is kind of like evolution there,
so much of what we see is based on pattern recognition and the fact that we've evolved
in such a way as to look at each other and like the slightest facial changes are so important
to the social uh you know survival of the group I I agree that now we you know we look up at
clouds and we see shapes we look up at things and we see shapes, our brains make these things happen
in order to protect us, right?
Like Alex creating such a moment
out of one little facial expression
and the way he transforms that into a demon,
you apply that to how he looks at a cloud
and you're like, it does make sense.
Like every, if a guy going, huh, is a demon to him,
a cloud is insane!
Sure, I think it is illustrative of the way that,
obviously, you're right, I mean,
like body language and facial expressions
are a huge part of communication.
Sure.
But Alex is off on how to read them.
Yeah!
And he's reading all of this stuff.
And there is a question, I guess,
to how much of it is convenient,
and he's doing it, he has a motivation to misread these things sure sure sure
or how much of it is just like his radar is broken I mean yeah is he just
don't is he just a fucked up like ape that has like a weird little skirt and
then that's it I think that that would explain a whole lot of the constantly
seeing demons in the grocery store
People's expressions changing to that of a demon and stuff, you know that could explain if he just has
No ability to read those social cues and facial expressions and that that form of communication
Yeah, or if it is all just misinterpreted. Yeah, I'm scared less of Alex than I am of just brains
Just brains in general
God fucking anything can go on up there. You mean like a crank. Yeah, you don't know
He could be in your gut right now. He is scary. Yeah, so
There's someone who worked at Info Wars. All right, don't know who it is could be but this person got sucked in by the Royals
Josh owns no, I don't think so, but this one got sucked in by the Royals
Okay, and let me care that whole sycophantic society of the Royals. Josh Owens? No, I don't think so. But this one got sucked in by the Royals. Okay.
And let me tell you, that whole sycophantic society of the Royals is another thing that
compromises so many good people in the UK.
People we worked with for a long time who were good folks, a decade ago got invited into
the British Circle and hung out with the echelons right beneath the Queen
and King Charles.
Lord Monkton?
Who is it?
And just like that, they got sucked in to a black hole, never to be effective or do
anything good again.
Okay.
That's how they work.
Forage?
No.
Could be.
No.
Now, if we can suck Elon Musk into liberty and
get ready to fight Tyrann, don't say it like that.
If he wants to join us, then the door is open, but make no mistake. I'm not being sucked
in by Elon Musk. Don't say like that.
I'm not entertaining that with the establishment like David Iz said, and I like David, but I see the good Musk is doing,
I encourage him to go in the right direction,
I criticize the bad, I support the good,
but let's make no mistake, I'm here to convert people
to the pro-human, pro-God destiny.
Okay, so Alex is absolutely getting sucked in by Musk.
What he's doing now is trying to pretend to have a spine
because he embarrassed himself with his subservience in the last episode. You may notice that Alex is absolutely getting sucked in by Musk. What he's doing now is trying to pretend to have a spine because he embarrassed himself
with his subservience in the last episode.
You may notice that Alex is claiming that he's thrilled with the good from Musk and
criticizes the bad, but that's not true.
He's not criticizing the bad, which should be things like Musk's government contracts
or his desire to put chips in people.
Alex is criticizing something really personal, which is his feeling that he's being shadow
banned. This isn't a real criticism is his feeling that he's being shadow-banned.
This isn't a real criticism about Musk anything that he's doing, it's really more of a press gambit.
What Alex is doing is trying to drive traffic to his Twitter and Bandod video while at the same time hoping to provoke a response from Elon.
If Elon just unblocks Alex's shit, if it's even blocked to begin with, Alex will be able to claim that he has pull with Musk.
Or even better, maybe the two of them can get into a little fight that nets both of them a bunch of attention
The kind of fight where Alex is totally sincere about his complaint that he yells about for a really long time
Then drops it really fast once his target gives him the attention that he craves. Yeah, you've seen that happen
I mean any moment now. He's gonna get Joe Rogan like a pig. He promised in the past
Well that dropped whenever he got rebooked. So I'm super curious though, which one of
Alex's buddies got sucked in by the Royals? I definitely don't believe it. Unless what
Alex means is that someone who worked there became a big fan of the Kansas City Royals.
Okay. And that might be. They had a couple of good years. True. Was that about 10 years
ago?
Um, yeah, it was about 10 years ago. Might be. Could be what happened.
Be what happened.
Yeah.
So Alex has a belief that is incorrect.
And that is that he doesn't censor on his sites, which is not true.
Oh, but, uh, yeah, he goes from there to deeply ununconfirmed territory.
Okay.
Now we've had issues because we're a small company compared to
something like X or Google or Facebook. And so we would have everybody's
small and he's had things on Band-Aid video and people would think we were
censoring them or members that we have on there had trouble uploading. I've seen
them complain later. Oh, it crashed. We had problems. You know,'s it's been a hassle it runs pretty good, but it's had some problems
So so I understand that there can be other things going on so I'm giving the must have been a bit of the doubt
Watching obvious squeezing going on the last few months. That's intensified
We're following all their rules. They're not hard to follow. It's never did anything that they claim we did before
Not threatening anybody. We're not showing poor. We're not doing any legal things.
And Musk said he was trying to go back to that system
that was there before.
Showing porn?
Before six, seven years ago.
So that's a good thing.
So we're still here watching it.
But I had a feeling last night when Dan Bongino showed
some of the secret document about not just surveillance,
but harassment.
And this goes back to 2016 when President Trump was President-elect.
We know Obama put in the stay-behind networks.
Parliament was declassified.
He had to sign the legislation in the Defense Authorization Act
before Trump got in to put it in place.
So that's why a lot of this is public.
Kind of the old vestiges of the old republic
were things that had to be transparent.
We knew about it.
But here's Bon Gino explaining what's going on or how we're being bumped or harassed or
terrorized and I had a feeling when I did that last night they'd probably censor it
and they did so I think if you look at all the evidence it was a lot of the deep staters
activating their bot armies and things.
Anytime we criticize NATO or anything it's up to, I see some of the throttling back as
well but here's the clip with Monjino and and again Bongino used to come on all the time
They had a Fox News
Contract and I know Fox's one either host come on and then he got fired a few years ago or left or whatever it was
I haven't tried getting back on since then. I like Bongino, but we've reached out to him no response back
He's a very credible guy senior former secret service Bongino
We need him to come on and obviously talk about this document talk about more of it
And I'll be perturbed if he doesn't come on but we we've reached out
So that's an open call right there that he should come on. I don't think you're gonna hear back
So you got this now is the story is developed into we covered this Bongino thing and
Obviously the deep state is attacking us for it which raises the question of why is Bongino not and
Then secondarily what about the band-odd video being banned that doesn't help with that at all
So we still have some confusion with the narrative
But Alex has decided that this is the path that we're gonna ascribe this part of the censorship to yeah because it works
It makes this seem like much more dangerous information.
It creates a whole new sort of side narrative out of this.
And yeah, cool, cool.
Yeah, I mean, the only thing that I say is a good add-on,
I would add this.
Make a new site called bonjino dot video only play that clip bond but banned
Gino banned Gino dot video. I like it. Yeah. There we go. I think I think it could stick
if it portmanteaus it goes. Yeah. That's what they say. Yeah. So Alex gives Elon Musk a
time frame under which he must respond. He must respond. There's a lot of monkey business going on, not just starting last night. And of course, we have proof. Band
out video, which was banned for years on Twitter, was brought back as soon as Musk freed us up three, four months ago. Now, band out video is banned again. So somebody went in there and blocked
that Elon Musk either needs to behind the scenes, restore it, or if he'd like to make a statement with why he's done this then I'll listen to him but this is a big deal that we're we're
a big story we're a big news outlet and I've really supported what he's done so far but
I've got some numbers I can call to get messages to Musk I'm gonna do that after the show today
and I'll give him a week or so I know he's a busy guy but I think he needs to respond
to this chase.
Yeah I absolutely agree and-
He's got a week to respond.
And also Chase Geyser is in the studio hanging out now.
I like a good week deadline.
Yeah.
I like a good week ultimatum.
But he makes them pretty regularly and then never sticks to them.
There is that.
He gave the people who are behind Q a week to reveal themselves before he does that.
I recall them.
He's going to expose everything and that never happened.
He almost did.
He almost did.
It happens a bit.
These ultimatums just go
I mean it is very similar to a lot of geopolitical things with red lines
Sometimes they don't yeah fully
Materialize yeah, we used to think that it was wrong to hurt people but apparently that's not a bad thing for governments
But that's that's where Alex is he's a week and we're not a week past the 26th
So you know this time hasn't passed yet. I don't know what has happened. I don't know if Musk is
Really trying to craft the perfect response
Yeah, really sitting with a team of writers and lawyers trying to come up with who how are we gonna?
Okay, how are we gonna respond to what do you think his statement would be it in Alex's mind? All right
Here's what a statement would be what the fuck are you talking about?
All right, but Alex is my statement, you know, like, so Alex is like, and here's what I think comes out with a statement, which is like him at a podium,
you know, doing the thing. Here's what I think Alex thinks. Okay. And there isn't going to
be a statement, but he'll just give Alex what he wants. Yeah. That's what I think Alex is
thinking. Yeah. Yeah. There'll be a quiet under the rug. Oh, here we fixed it for sure. Or
whatever. And then blame it on some kind of rogue actor who was there.
That's what I think Alex thinks is going to happen.
So Chase Geiser is sitting in because he's a tech expert.
I'm sorry?
Yeah.
OK.
So Alex explains his ideal solution.
OK.
Even he himself admitted that his own account was
censored from trending because they
had some algorithm in place where if an account had been
Reported any number of times any minimum number of times and automatically would remove it from trending and that's why he
Intelligently defaulted himself out of it. He just needs to default a certain list of targeted accounts from the regular algorithm king
Yeah, absolutely. I shouldn't interrupt you. That's the key to this. That's the key to this. Just give me free reign
Let me do whatever I want. Can people complain about me ignore it. Can it can you get more?
2020 2024 version of some are more equal than others. Can you get more?
Whatever they want right as opposed to the people who can't that are not famous. Yes. Yeah. I mean, that's amazing.
It's a good solution for Alex.
That is of all the things for your JBS ass bullshit to lead to.
You being like, Hey, I'm going to say this shit unironically.
I demand special treatment because I'm a whiny boy.
Yeah. Yeah.
So Chase Geiser loves Musk. And it turns out he has a whiny boy. Yep. Yep. So Chase geyser. Yeah loves musk
And it turns out he has a rationale for that great
Not only is it difficult for me to think of a single thing that he's actually done throughout his career that I disagree with
Oh, I would have had that's a difference from the standpoint of okay
Who hates them just like you said Alex and that's one of the reasons why I'm voting for Donald Trump
It's not because I agree with everything that he ever did or said, but it's because all
of the world's super villains hate him.
So he must be our best shot if he is most hated by the enemy.
I think the same is true for Musk in the, in the tech startup world.
It wasn't only these lawsuits, but also the subsidies that were pulled from, from Tesla
and a few months ago, we reported on that here in Info Wars.
He wasn't given tax subsidies that he was eligible for for whatever reason that was not really particularly
disclosed or the reason that they gave was not substantial in any way shape or form.
So, so that that strategy of who the my supervillains are against is a little bit of a bad strategy.
Kind of is a good way to talk yourself into supporting ISIS. Or all of Alex's supervillains and shit would have really been against Hitler in World War
II.
So I mean, it's a good way to talk yourself into some bad conclusions about people.
So in December, Tesla announced that the tax credit that you would get for buying a Tesla
Model 3S was going to go away. Previously,
you got a substantial credit because it was an electric vehicle. However, the Biden administration
made a new rule that vehicles would not be eligible for this credit if they were, quote,
assembled with any battery components or critical materials sourced from foreign entities of
concern. This probably has to do with Tesla relying heavily on China for their batteries., so when chase says that there was no explanation given for why these subsidies are removed
He's kind of lying or he never bothered to check right and I would imagine it's well
I mean if your big bad is China
And your God King is
Man these people just I there I can't do people just, I can't do it.
I just can't do it.
How do you do this?
How do you do this?
How do you support Elon?
I don't even know how to get into the mind of somebody
who's not insane.
Because he likes everything that he's ever done
in his career.
Can't think of anything he's opposed to.
That's an insane thing to say.
It is.
That's an insane thing to say that makes me concerned.
But this is Chase Geyser, right? I I'm concerned you're not applying the geyser
standard concerned I'm concerned so look Bongino yeah I'm out with this
document but he didn't and Alex got censored for it but he didn't didn't and
in this document they talk about bumping you got to get bumped right right
like sharks whenever they they give you a little bump and then or you know when
you're on booked on a comedy show and someone more famous shows up.
Sure. Yeah, that's happened.
So Alex talks about a situation where he got bumped. Uh, and it turns out, I don't know
if this is true.
One time I walked out of the store, leaving Trump hotel, just gone to confronted Congress
and just confronted Rubio like two hours for and I'm literally eating a hamburger
in the bar area because that's all that was open and
You know in comes this person
Well-known person I've released a shuttle the up and they're like hey this company the internet research group
The rocks is what's gonna be three million dollars right now. No question. That's all legal just sign this document
It's all legal. I think legal people said up.. I'm an American citizen. Get out of here. I'm going to report this.
The person got really freaked out and ran off.
But, but, and then later, but that, that's how bad this is folks.
That that, I mean, and there's a bunch of other stuff happened too.
You know, just a few months ago, they put an MI6 group out of Dubai on us.
And they don't want me to get into all of it.
We report to the FBI as well.
MI6 group.
And we'll, we'll, we'll, of it. We report to the FBI as well.
MI6 group.
Out of the FBI.
Well, the FBI, they're corrupt. Yeah, we go to them and say, I got your ass in the
cookie jar, leave us alone. And of course it's obviously wasn't the local Austin FBI
running this. It's run out of DC.
Obviously, obviously. Yeah. So I don't know if I believe that. But Alex is claiming that
he turned down $3 million from the Internet Research Agency. Not group. He has the name
wrong. But this is interesting because that's an online propaganda organization associated
with the head of the Wagner group. You've got any progosian. I have no former true.
Yeah. I have no belief that this actually happened. But the real point is that you'd
never be able to tell the difference if it had distinguishable. Yep. Alex is totally
in sync with their line about the war in Ukraine,
and he's even aired a recruitment video put out by the Wagner group multiple times.
I don't think that anyone working in espionage like this would feel the need to try to bribe Alex,
since he does the job for free, and he's clearly not someone you can trust.
Yeah, all you'd do is just be like, hey, you're doing a great job and we love you,
and Putin loves you and Progosian loves you, well, I mean, not anymore because, you know.
Yeah, that's all you'd need to do.
You never want to give him money.
Why would you create a conspiracy with the conspiracy guy?
I mean, insane.
Just, and just the idea of, the idea of Alex,
because- He got bumped.
Because of course Alex is going to create the character
who is like, hey, here you go, three million, it briefcase it's all legal it's all legal are you sure it's
legal whoa you're on to me and then he's running away that's that is that is
the character that Alex creates right I do wonder who he's pretending that is I
don't know someone at Trump Hotel probably at that time yeah obviously maybe
a way well-known figure no it can't be a waiter. Yeah, someone well-known. That's true. Hmm Trump
Who's the most well-known wait?
Thank you, Trump. Okay, so Alex has a guest on in third hour and I just said no, thank you
Well, it's a popular guest. He's Dr. Kirk Elliott. He's back in studio with us from Colorado visiting
We really are glad he's here with us
studio with us from Colorado visiting. We really are glad he's here with us.
He did an hour and a half with us a month ago.
People really loved it. It informed a lot of people. Totally.
This is his gold sponsor. Yep. So he's, uh,
he's doing an hour with his gold sponsor at the end of the show. It's just a infomercial basically.
So I wanted to nail down a little bit more about what happened with this,
this musk story. Sure.
And so Alex revisits this
on the 28th. Okay. Because there had been some media coverage of his comments from the episode
that we just listened to. Okay. And so here is Alex responding. Okay, this is our post script.
Yes. Gotcha. This is from the 28th. Gotcha. And Alex is responding to news coverage about his
Gotcha. And Alex is responding to news coverage about his, uh,
comments. Of course.
This is a great example of the Soros funded media and it's, it's on record that raw story and Buzzfeed and those other groups,
vice you name it are funded by Soros and they're propped up to put out.
RIP.
There's an incredible deception.
And they're propped up to put out all right. He's an incredible deception
So this story came out yesterday and was trending on Twitter
Alex Jones calls Elon Musk a complete and total fraud
Turns on Elon Musk after he's massively censored
Now I never called him a complete and total fraud I said Google is a complete and total fraud. I said Google is a complete and total fraud.
So Alex is entirely wrong about this story.
This is a this raw story article makes it clear that he was calling Google a complete
and total fraud as we heard in the clips we were listening to earlier.
If you actually read the story, it's clear that that's what he's saying.
However, if you only rely on headlines, then you might come away with a false perspective
on the article. The headline is quote, complete and total fraud. Alex turns on Elon Musk after
he's massively censored. I'll be totally clear. I think this is a bullshit headline for a
number of reasons. First off, it's sensational and clickbait in the way that it's written
because it does imply that Alex called Musk a complete and total fraud. If you think that
it doesn't, then you are being
obtuse. It's misleading that way and anyone posting
this would understand how someone is going to read the headline and you'd know that.
It's ridiculous. Second, it's not totally fair to say that
Alex turned on Musk. I guess that's kind of true, but it's an oversimplification of what
Alex is actually doing. He's trying to course correct from his absurd support for Musk that got a lot of pushback from the audience, and he's trying
to turn that into an opportunity for him to harvest attention. In that sense, this article
was giving him exactly what he wanted.
Oh!
There's a sort of mainstream article about him. This raises the odds that Musk will take
notice and respond in some way, and now Alex gets to go on his show and insists that the
media is lying about him. They're not, but this headline kind of makes it look like they are and with bullshit artists like Alex
That's all that really matters the optics of this are good cue the circle of life. Yeah. Yeah, so it turns out that this did
Prompt a response from Elon Musk on Twitter
And so now Alex discusses the back and forth that happened on Twitter. This is news. I hate everybody. And so Elon responded last night to tweet
a post on X and it said, what is it that Alex Jones is complaining about?
And I had just gotten home from a church meeting. I went to give me more details
until don't get to the meat of the story Tuesday night church service
Tell me more about it with my oldest daughter. Oh, yeah, what's she doing?
How's school? I?
Was getting calls the only home at you on my
axing not on ecstasy but on the site posting on X also on ecstasy. Yeah, and
Posting on X also on X is yeah, and
Despite what the problem is
So I don't want to text while I drive so I pulled over into a gas station
About nine o'clock do I need to know when and read their austerity and called up chase geyser who's a real go-getter
Geyser and said hey will you go grab that club?
And when you post this, what actually said.
And then will you respond? And I dictated real quick to him when I wanted him to say.
And then within 10 minutes, the guys like a speed racer.
He already had it up.
That's too long to type.
And then Elon said, Well, there's your fake news.
And then they put a community notes on.
The raw story saying fake news, which is
the strongest condemnation that they do. So they've got a humiliating amount of egg on
their face, but nice, nice try guys.
Chase Geyser is becoming more and more important. It turns out I think he's a sent into the
info wars worm tongue in it. I think is what's going on here so I just while I was preparing this episode today I went and checked the raw story post about
this and there is no community note on it calling it fake news in the replies though
you can find Chase Geyser reporting it to community notes just begging for censorship
there you call in the hall monitor over yeah the raw story is not strictly speaking fake
news it's a correct story with a bullshit
slightly misleading headline. Alex understands all about writing bullshit misleading headlines,
so he's not really in a position to judge here. But if Alex really wants to make some
hay here, he should complain about the uprocks story covering the raw story article. That
one definitely did say that Alex called Twitter a complete and total fraud, with their headline
being quote, even Alex Jones thinks X is a complete and total fraud since it was bought by Elon
Musk. They misrepresented the raw story article in exactly the way the headline was at risk
of people misinterpreting it, and it's just a pointless article. It's not covering Alex's
comments. It's a blog post covering raw stories blog post about Alex's comments, and the game
of telephone isn't good for anyone in terms of
Actually getting at what was actually said and and dealing with it. It's it's it's it's causing
harm to information being
Seminated as opposed to the alternative. Yeah. Yeah, if there was one thing that I hoped would have happened by now
one thing that I hoped would have happened by now,
it would be the realization on the media's part that Alex turns them into Alex.
Like every time they try their dumbasses to cover this,
they wind up doing something that Alex does
and revealing themselves to be idiots.
Yeah, not every time, but it is at a high risk.
It is. More often than not. does and revealing themselves to be idiots. Yeah, not every time, but it is at a high risk. Yeah.
It is more often than not.
Yeah.
It's wise to exercise caution and not play clickbait games whenever you're covering
Alex because it will be used to his advantage.
Yeah.
I mean, just the number of times that somebody should have gone, well, this is too easy.
Should it, I mean, right?
Yeah.
It's too easy. Probably. That I mean, right? Yeah, it's too easy.
Probably that word to is there to warn you.
Yeah. So Alex is talking about this raw story article.
And he's accusing people of going off half cocked.
And and he relates it to something else
that I think is not applicable.
We wrote an article about it at info wars dot com last night.
Been worn work late to get that done, did a great job.
We wrote another one this morning, Kelly McBrain did.
Fake News 101, media falsely claims Alex Jones called Elon Musk a fraud.
And it chronicles it and has all the screenshots if you want to see it.
So that's a great example of people going off half cocked
Here's another one
Because this became a big story on X and got picked up by news and we talked to Bongino my producer this morning and he said he's
Had 50 calls that this morning
Hundreds of you know emails you name it
former Secret Service senior Secret Service agent bustlebl, and he called my producer back and said, listen, I'm not talking about the story anymore.
My source is already scared to death for their life,
and I can't give Alex any more information.
And will you just please tell people, stop contacting me?
Weird.
So I get it, he's a busy guy. He's got the stuff going
on. He's doing. That's fine. But the internet turned this into a fight between me and Bonjino.
Bonjino breaks the story from a high level source inside the intelligence agencies about
what a lot of which has been declassified that I was on a list of 26 people, including
President Trump to be harassed.
Of course, Bongino doesn't want to talk more about this.
He was just talking shit on his show and now Alex has turned it into him releasing a page
from a classified document which he's planning to release the rest of soon.
There was no document and Alex has entirely misreported this story because the fake version
is more exciting and makes him look like more of a victim.
So here's the long and short of this, according to Alex.
Dan Bongino used to come on in for war as a bunch, which is fairly true.
I'm not sure he was ever a super regular guest, but he was on from time to time.
Back then, Bongino was a no-name guy whose only claim to fame was that he used to be in
the Secret Service protecting Obama.
He parlayed that into a little right-wing media career and it led to him getting Alex's attention.
At that time, as is the case in the present day, Alex would embellish things that primary
sources would say and this applied to Bonjino. Alex would come up with completely absurd
things the Secret Service people were claiming about Obama and not use Bonjino's name, but
everyone would put two and two together and realize that was what Alex was trying to imply.
According to Alex, Bonjino confronted Alex multiple times, asking if he was claiming Dan as a source
and Alex would deny it, saying things like, you think you're the only person in the government I know?
Like he does in this clip.
I still don't know why
Bonjino years ago repeatedly called me and I talked to him also off air once during an interview
and said said hey man
Is it you you know that New York tough guy Dylan?
He is a tough guy month. He's that New York tough guy thing. Hey man. Is it you tell people you're getting yourself for me?
And I said no
Well, you think you're the only person I'd know in the government so at some point a while back Bongino had had enough of it
And he stopped coming on the show now Alex is doing the same shit
He's taken a small snip at a Bongino show where where he shows a Microsoft Word ass image of a list of names he claims the source told him were to be bumped,
and Alex has reported this as Bonjino releasing a page of a classified document and the rest is coming soon.
Bonjino is full of shit and I don't really care about him at all, but I can understand how he would be pretty pissed about this whole thing.
Alex is trying to hijack his story and take ownership of it away from Bonjino, which is kind of ironic since Bonjino is just trying to hijack the story from Michael Schellenberger and Matt Taibbi.
But like, you take control away from Bonjino, and now if Bonjino doesn't produce a classified document, Alex's audience is going to think that Bonjino is covering this up.
Sure.
There's a real difficulty that this introduces the way that Alex is
hijacking. Right. I mean I have limited sympathy. You know true. You know like when when when
Ed Norton steals all the money from the from Mark Wahlberg in that one movie you know with
Charlize Theron. I was I was like hey hey guess what shouldn't have been a thief. I
don't know what do you expect?
I totally understand the limited sympathy
and I'm not trying to be like, whoa is Bonjino,
but I am saying that understanding this dynamic,
I get where Bonjino would be mad at Alex.
That's more my point than to be like, I feel bad for him.
I do kind of feel bad for him because there's probably,
based on what Alex is saying,
seems like a lot of Alex's audience
is probably contacting Bonjino and being like,
hey, where's the rest of this shit?
Yeah, but see, here's the thing.
It's annoying.
Mark Wahlberg and Charlize Theron got together,
stole it back.
Bonjino's just whining.
All these people whine.
Well, he's whining privately, apparently.
Exactly.
So it appears that Bonjino reached out to Alex
to say he doesn't want to come on
and doesn't want to talk more about this story
that Alex is misrepresenting, and that jogged Alex's memory about why to say he doesn't want to come on and doesn't want to talk more about this story that Alex is misrepresenting and that jogged
Alex's memory about why Bongino doesn't come on the show anymore.
Right.
What's interesting to me is how this is supposed to be another case of people going off half-cocked.
Just like the raw story got wrong about Alex and Musk, that was the case of it.
This is supposed to be another case of people on Twitter going off half-cocked, saying that
Alex and Bongino are beefing. But in reality, Alex went off half cocked when he was
fraudulently covering Bongino story or maybe double cocked because it was having
it was over the top. I don't know. I do not know. So we end. We end with, um, I'm
not sure we have a resolution about the Elon Musk thing. Alex is, uh, I guess
gotten a response from Musk
in terms of him saying, what's Alex mad about
in response to the Raw Story article?
And then Alex is claiming that Musk made the Raw Story article
or the Community Notes made it fake news.
And so I guess that's some kind of a victory,
but it doesn't address Alex's main complaints,
which are the censorship and him not being
able to post banned on video links.
So we don't know have any real resolution about that.
But we do know apparently that he can't post something about a fake version of Dan Bonjino's
big breaking classified document that wasn't.
So that's what's behind the censorship, but it's not okay because it predates that I
don't know do okay now I
Don't know if it's real
Okay, but is there some sort of way to put Elon Musk and Alex and Dan Bonjito
Into like a small mirror type square
and then send them off into space forever
next to General Zod.
No, shit.
Yeah, I'm sorry.
But that would have been a really good solution
to all of this.
The Phantom Zone is probably the best way to go.
Well, I mean, unfortunately that is not real,
but one thing that we could take some,
You're killing me today, man.
We can take some solace in the reality that you know spiritually they are in a mirror cube
in fact they have to do with each other that is true they seem to be pissing
each other off a little bit that is true so that you know that is kind of an
unfortunate fate for anyone to find themselves in yeah yeah yeah there is a
sort there's a certain scorpion and Toadass relationship here.
Yeah.
Yeah.
What did you think I was going to do?
I'm a fucking Scorpion.
Of course you're part of my conspiracy, Dick Watt.
Yeah, you let me back in and what do you know?
I found a fucking conspiracy and it's about you.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
Congratulations.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, absolutely.
Well.
There is that.
So, we come to the end of this and it is, it is a interesting sort of next step from Alex's
Friday episode that we covered on Wednesday.
This gushing defensive, I identify with criticisms about Mosk and it hurts me personally into
this and I think that in terms of conspiracy s shit, this is a move in the right direction
for Alex.
Right. This is him getting where he needs to be.
That's more sustainable.
Yeah.
You know, defending Musk in the long term is not going to work.
It's going to end up having too many things.
You're going to have to wallpaper over.
And so this is the right thing to do.
Yeah.
You can still pretend that you're like,
hey, I think he's doing a lot of great stuff.
You know, you can still hold onto that a little bit,
but you need to have a far more critical posture.
And good for Alex coming around on that.
Good luck sticking to it,
because I have a, oh boy.
Well, he shits gold bricks.
There's too much that's gonna lure you back.
That's kind of the problem with being an addict.
I don't know if you know this but a lot of times they make
decisions that are negative towards the truth yeah I hope Alex Fox around and
get some self-kick back off Twitter I mean there's gotta be there's no other
way this can end right that's how it's supposed to go I think I think it's
destined right but we'll see what kind of level of patience must cast I mean as
compared to the people who on the site before. Yeah. I mean, it's not patient so much as it is. Like at what point does this
man admit that he's wrong? Or at what point does he recognize that the cost is not worth
it? Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Or come up with some rationalization to make himself not sound
like he's saying I was wrong to let Alex Jones back on. And yet at the same time admit that
he was so simple. I mean, the reason that he said that he wasn was wrong to let Alex Jones back on it's so at the same time admit that he was so simple I mean the reason that he said that he
wasn't going to let him back on in the first place was cuz I'm gonna hook stuff
yeah like he could just say I looked into it more and Alex is lying about
what he did about Sandy Hook not hard it would rationalize and kicking him back
off would be the simplest thing it wouldn't be out right right ah but it
would it would because then he wouldn't be as cool.
Maybe.
And I'll tell you what, I swear to God, this world is dominated by whether or not Elon
Musk is feeling cool at any given point in time.
And Alex, as we know, the king of cool.
Yep. So anyway, we'll be back for
another episode. Oh God. But tell them we have a website. And do we do it's all right
to come. Yep. We're also on blue sky. We are on blue sky. It's all right. Yeah. And if
you're listening to this, there will be a new stackie out. So that's it. Stackie dot
sub stack stack ease dot sub. Yeah, I guess it should have been. Yeah. Oh well. Redo.
Yeah. Start from the top. But until then, Neil, I'm the on DZ. Yeah. Oh well redo. Yeah start from the top
Until then I'm Neon Leo. I'm DZX Clarks You do doop doop. It should have done it right at the top
It's literally how we that's how we should end it from now on. Yep. Yep
And now here comes the sex robots Andy and Kansas you're on the air. Thanks for holding
So Alex I'm a person color. I'm a huge fan. I love your work. I love you