Knowledge Fight - #906: January 9, 2008
Episode Date: March 4, 2024In this installment, Dan and Jordan shoot back to the past to explore the day that Alex uncovered a nefarious plot to steal the 2008 New Hampshire primary from Ron Paul....
Transcript
Discussion (0)
I'm sick of them posing as if they're the good guys saying we are the bad guys
Knowledge fight. Dan and George knowledge fight.
Need money.
Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas. Stop it. Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas. Andy and Kansas, Andy and Kansas, Andy and Kansas.
Andy and Kansas, Andy and Kansas.
It's time to pray.
Andy and Kansas, you're on the air.
Thanks for holding.
Hello, Alex and Mr. Tim Collin.
I'm a huge fan and love your work.
Knowledge Fight.
No, no, no, no, no, knowledgefight.com.
I love you.
Hey, everybody.
Welcome back to Knowledge Fight MD.
I'm Jordan.
We're Couple Dudes.
I sit around, worship with the altar of Selene,
and talk a little bit about Alex Jones. Indeed, right on there. I'm Jordan work up a dude's like sit around worship at the altar of Celine and talk a little bit about Alex
Joe. Oh, indeed we are Dan Jordan Jordan quick question for you. So what's your
right spot today? But my right spot today Jordan because I fucked it up on the
last episode. I forgot. I got the stackies back going nice stackies dot
sub stack dot com indeed. They got a post out on Friday and I fucked up again. How'd you fuck up this time?
Well, I always feel like
Everybody gets so much fucking spam and so much sure and so there's a drop-down menu when you're publishing a post
And says send to all subscribers right through email, which makes sense
They're the ones who subscribe it does the idea is they want the email right? Yes
subscribe. The idea is they want the email. Right. Yes. It's a check that though. That's the wrong check. Exactly. I don't
check that. So like I don't think a lot of people actually do
this happen. This came out or were reminded. So I think
there's an option where I can send out a send the post to
everybody. Right. I may end up doing that after the fact. I
still have been like thinking about should I do that? Is that
right? Is that bothering people no of course
I think the that of all the things that you do. This is the one time you're like, please
Send me email. I have to go out of my way to not get emails from people in this case people are going please
Sure, I'm sure I mean if you subscribe you probably want to be reminded, but yeah, anyway that
That's there if you want to find it directly. That's where it's at do it and it's good time
And then you'll get an email later. Yeah, probably for that from me
Hey, hey, are you ready?
Hack my the sub stack in order to take care of this the plan
So it's your bright spot my bright spot the wife and I went to a movie theater
For the first time in five years.
I knew this was coming.
Yeah, we saw a dune.
Right.
Yep, it was good.
Cool.
Yep, moving on.
You got some spice?
I did not get any spice.
There was plenty of spice.
Did you get the much memed popcorn bucket?
No, we went to the Logan Theater,
which is infinitely better.
I don't even know if that popcorn bucket's real. I just keep seeing pictures of it on
Twitter. I don't want any part of any, but I don't even want the internet.
If I worked at a movie theater, I would replace the bottles of the yellow salt that they put
on the popcorn and label it spice. Oh yeah. Malone.
Uh-huh. No, I don't want to cater to that much.
Yeah. All right. All right.
Hit the broad.
Fast.
And I'd have everybody dress up like worms.
Yeah.
I know very little about Dune.
I think you've crushed it so far.
You've nailed it. 100%.
I've heard it's good.
I've heard movies good.
It's really good.
I would recommend like watch them both when it comes out.
I think you'd actually really enjoy watching them,
but only if you watch them both as at your leisure. Mm-hmm. You got about five hours to invest, right?
Mm-hmm spend a day, you know, maybe take an hour off the same way people read Dune
Experience the movie sure be like that. This is talking about like with an intermission and take a shit
You know and then watch it watch it while you're doing that and then turn it off and then move on to another thing.
See, for me, I don't really ever have the drive to watch movies.
Sure.
And so I feel like I'd need to go to a theater to watch it.
It would need to be an appointment thing.
Yeah.
But yeah, maybe I'll watch them down the road.
Also, I mean, it's just, I would watch it in theater just because it's like big.
It's big.
Big old worms. Yeah, yeah, yeah So, you know somebody else who probably watch doing
I would assume so but we're not gonna be talking about the present day
We have an episode to go over from the past
Sure, we'll get down to business on exactly what happened there, but before we do let's say hello to some new walks
That's great idea. So first we can solve the great Chicago land potato tomato debate through protoplast fusion
creating pomados.
parentheses this is a real thing thank you so much you are now policy wonk.
I'm a policy wonk.
Thank you very much.
Thank you next Alex Jones is basically a pinchan character come to life except his name is too
boring it should be like frothing ham owl glass or something thank you you so much. You're now policy wonk. I'm a policy
one. Thank you very much. Thank you. Next today's trucker speed is brought to you
by raid shadow legends. Thank you so much. You're now policy wonk. I'm a policy
one. Thank you very much. Next multi versus tonight. Tom it taught multi
versus. I keep parentheses on the wrong word. Okay. I got multi verse tonight's
Thomas Townley. Thank you so much. You're now word. Okay. I got multi-verse tonight's Thomas
Townley. Thank you so much. You're now policy wonk. I'm a policy wonk. Thank you very much.
Thank you. And I don't think I ever applied for a shout out. Just Robert is fine for
that. Thank you so much. You're now policy wonk. I'm a policy wonk. Thank you very much.
Thank you. And we got a technocrat in the mix, Jordan. So thank you so much to I made
a patreon to support Yiff games and this podcast. Don't tell my wife. Thank you so much. You're
now a technocrat. I'm a policy wonk. Four stars. this podcast don't tell my wife. Thank you so much. You're an hour technocrat
I'm a policy wonk
Someone someone sotomite sent me a buck at a poop daddy shark
Jar Jar Binks has a caribbean black action
He's a loser little little titty baby. I don't want to hate black people. I renounce Jesus Christ. Thank you so much
Yes, thank you very much. So here's the situation Jordan. Yes
I've been going back and trying to get all the episodes for the live shows ready, right?
And so through doing that I end up listening to a bunch episodes that we don't end up using because they're not good
Or they're not good for live shows, right?
But occasionally I come across something that I think is like oh boy
This is something that we should talk about. It's just not good for on a stage that happens
So I did find one such episode. Okay, I thought okay. This would be interesting thing to cover
It's sort of out of the blue. I could use a little break from the Elon Musk saga at the present day
So dear Lord. Yes, so I wanted to go to the past
So I decided there were two options we could continue in 2004 which are not abandoning but it
would be you know we could go to the 2004 or we could do this episode that I
decided was good but not for a live episode right so you gave me the options
I texted you did out of the blue a or b yeah now here's the thing uh-huh you I
chose the other one and you've decided we're gonna go with this one.
Yes.
I gave you the illusion of choice because it wasn't about what you actually chose.
It was how I would feel after you made the choice.
Okay, okay.
So if I chose randomly incorrectly and you felt like, oh, we should have done that, that
would tip you over the edge into deciding which one to do.
I wasn't sure which one I wanted to do.
I wasn't sure if I was really fully into doing this episode.
So I wanted you to either choose it and see how I felt,
or you chose the other one and see if I was disappointed.
That is fascinating, because that
suggests that the best way for you to chart a path forward
is through regret.
Uh, duh.
But that's not possible from an entropic standpoint.
Sure.
So we need to predict what is going to go wrong
for you in the future so you can not do that.
Trust me, my brain is constantly thinking
of the ways things could go wrong.
I've noticed.
So, yeah.
But anyway, this episode is January 9th, 2008. I will not tell you what
episode this could have been for the live show. I won't tell you. Okay. I won't tell
you why this day was chosen. I won't tell you what city. All right. Nothing. Okay. None
of that. Okay. January 8th. It might have been for Toronto 2008. All right. So we're
in ninth, 2000 January 9th, 2008. We're in a recession. That financial
crash has happened. We're all going crazy. None of this is a factor in today's show.
Okay. Sorry. I'm just trying to get to the mood. No. The primary season is upon us though.
Right. We're in the 2008 primaries and kind of at the beginning, the Iowa caucus has happened.
Oh, yeah. So we just
had the New Hampshire primary. Okay. And that will become the focus of this episode.
Right. Right. It's madness. It's absolute madness. I'm excited. We all remember where
we were when the New Hampshire primary of 2008 happened. I don't think we do. I think
some people have some memories of it, but they've also forgotten them. And now we will
reawaken those memories.
Here's where the episode starts off.
The big national debate for the last two days, I didn't talk about it once yesterday but
everybody wants to talk about it.
Hillary cried and they're having debates about was it real.
The neo-conversing, oh yes it's real, she thought she was going to lose so she cried. This is a woman who goes to Kentucky and goes,
how are you? Good day to you. She comes to Texas and she talks like this. They put videos together
online of four or five different fake accents. She'll go to England and adopt an Atlantic or you know
Eastern. Oh, Buffy. Type thirst and hell. Of course it's fake. Why do you obsess on things
like that that don't matter? It doesn't matter. Doesn't matter. Wait. So the point of this
is not that she changes her accent. No, but
he likes doing voices. So I think that's right. So the point is you shouldn't care about this
thing that I just spent quite a while talking about. Yeah. The point is that she does this
fake shit like these accents. So obviously she's faking the crying but also who cares.
Right. Fine. Okay.
So this was a pretty big deal in the 2008 primary season in January when Hillary Clinton
didn't cry but welled up a tiny bit when answering questions at an undecided voters meeting.
She was asked how she keeps going on the campaign trail and she said it was hard but she loved
the country and while answering she looked like she was expressing some real emotion.
This was notable because the press liked to characterize Hillary as a heartless robot type, in no small part thanks to the
inherent misogyny that ran under media coverage back then, and to a lesser extent still. If
Hillary showed normal human emotion, she would be branded as too emotional to lead on account of her
irrational femininity. Conversely, if she showed no emotion, she was a calculating power-hungry
machine with ice water in her veins.
Basically, the media had a negative way to frame her actions no matter how she acted.
After this incident in 2008, Hillary pulled out an unexpected win in the New Hampshire
primary, largely due to a surge in women voters turning out.
The polling about this primary was all over the place, and part of the reason was the
chaotic beginning to both the campaigns for Obama and for Hillary. Hillary was the presumptive favorite before the primary
started and was polling way ahead. Then Obama won the Iowa caucuses and Hillary came in
third behind Obama and John Edward. Obama carried that momentum and Hillary's campaign
took a huge hit in people's estimation polling numbers went way down
And this is part of what's in the background of that question
She was asked at the voter meeting about how she keeps going
It obviously wasn't all about her emotional moment
But she overperformed in New Hampshire and the media talked about it a lot and this is part of the story
Gotcha anyway
The media has now made it a story that Hillary was showing emotion and people in Alex's media space have decided to argue whether she was faking it or not
And like I said, I think Alex just likes doing voices. Yeah, I think she's a voice actor that Obama derailed his voice acting career
That is true
Was Star Lord supposed to be Star Lord and Guardians of the Galaxy so close so close that's two million that he tossed away
Oh, I'll still easily two million. Yeah. Yeah
So this doesn't really matter, but this
is where Alex starts things off. The rest of this will not be about Hillary. You know,
when you're constructing a narrative, I think it's always a good way to start with stuff
that you can throw away. Sure. Absolutely disposable. This is dipping your toe in the
water. Make it useless. And I like Alex liking voices. Yeah, that's low stakes
That is true. So Alex there's this there's this pre polling of the New Hampshire
Electorate and it was off right Hillary was supposed to lose
She was down a number of points. Yeah, and then she ended up beating Obama by a couple points
And so Alex has decided that the reason is a diable
of voting machines
okay they're having to spend right now nationally that okay barack obama was
between ten and twenty points depending on the poll in every poll ahead of
hillary and polls have always been accurate until diable gets involved and
magically uh... he was winning in the areas with the 20% of areas where there wasn't
die-bold and then of course losing where there was die-bold just like the individual who's
the head of the Democrats right now who I don't trust but he wasn't the anointed one.
He wasn't George Bush, he wasn't John Kerry and that of course is Howard Dean and he
won in New Hampshire as high as 10 points, some areas lower, some areas higher,
but on average the news reported 9 to 10 points in the areas that have paper ballots,
but lost by 10 points in the areas where it was die-bolt. The three-state area,
80 plus percent of the ballots are controlled by one company and one man.
So if you follow, the argument Alex is making is that the reason the vote didn't match the polling is because of die-bold voting machines which naturally were used to steal the election.
This is an early run of some of the same shit Alex did about Dominion and Smartmatic in the 2020 election, so I thought it might noticeable difference in the voting patterns in areas that use optical scan technology to count votes and those that do hand counts.
If this was the extent of Alex's point, then he would be correct. Researchers at William & Mary Law School did an analysis of this primary and found that Hillary got 4.3% more of the vote in machine wards, whereas Obama got 6.1% more in hand count wards.
This is interesting,
but it doesn't really tell us anything on its own.
There are plenty of reasons that this disparity could exist
other than fraud being carried out by voting machines.
However, Alex doesn't work like that.
There's the appearance of something that works for him,
so he jumps to the conclusion
that he was already planning to report,
and then he asserts it to the audience as studied fact.
The William & Mary analysis went a little bit deeper and had this to say, quote, using
a subset of New Hampshire wards that have similar demographic features and voting histories
but differ in their vote tabulating technologies, we find no significant relationship between
a wards use of vote tabulating technology and the votes or vote shares received by most of the leading
candidates who competed in the 2008 New Hampshire presidential primaries.
They went on to say, quote, our results are consistent with these differences being due
entirely to the fact that New Hampshire wards that use AccuVote optical scanned machines
have voters with different political preferences than wards that use hand-couted paper ballots.
It was a limited sample due to the requirement of finding wards that use hand-counded paper ballots. It was a
limited sample due to the requirement of finding wards that could be matched, but
their analysis found no reason to believe that the method of vote counting
was responsible for one candidate doing better in places that counted votes one
way as opposed to the other. It was a function of wards having different
political preferences. So anyway, Alex just has something that looks weird and
he's found the easiest and most convenient explanation for it
Which just so happens to be the one that's in line with his narratives
And so that's the truth and we've proven it. It's in the white papers. It's been declassified. Yeah
Yeah, yeah
Yeah, that's fun. It is I mean that is such a fun like
When you when you account for variables variables that's how you learn stuff
right and that's cool everybody likes learning things and that's applicable
and useful right but whenever you don't and you just have a bunch of weird ass
data points that's a lot of fun it is you know like that could be crazy or it
could just be like you know there's more money in places and there's more money
they voted for Hillary more the places that, you know, there's more money in places and where there's more money. They voted for Hillary more.
The places that are counting are usually higher population density areas and things like that.
There's there are tons of different patterns that track with this totally and to not consider that is so dumb.
It's my but it is it is like how we get here is not Alex's fault.
It's not in a sense in this sense, right?
Everybody can hear Alex go like, oh, in one there's data machines and others there's not
and there's a difference and everybody can go, well, if those two things are true and
there's no other details I need to know, you are correct, sir.
Yeah, Alex doesn't ask the follow up question to is there another reason why this could
be the case?
Right.
But he pretends that what he's doing
is critical thinking as opposed to what it is,
which is the absence of critical thinking.
This is just taking effect and shoving it into the mold
that you already have.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
And that's fun.
No, in a sense, there's so much of our world
that is just like ultimately coming down to people convincing you you've already critically thought and people trying to
convince you to start because it's never happened before yeah yeah so Alex is
running a number of websites at this point right we got info wars yeah
prison planet sure we got the Jones report do we yeah those website that he
used to have I don't know if it was going in 2008 okay he had some weird thing
about Arnold Schwarzenegger and how much he hated him now I Yeah, that was a website that he used to have. I don't know if it was going in 2008. OK. He had some weird thing about Arnold Schwarzenegger
and how much he hated him.
Now I'm in.
That was during the recount.
Painting show and a recall.
Personal attacks on Arnold Schwarzenegger.
Those are the two things we need.
And there's another website that is the Ron Paul War Room.
We got a lot of emails and calls.
They love war rooms.
On the Ron Paul War Room last night that we confirmed.
We called the people and they said, well, we're talking to county officials first before
we talk to you.
Yeah, we went on your RonPaulWarRoom.com and posted that our whole family voted at this
township in New Hampshire and it showed zero for Ron Paul.
But now the township is telling us that don't talk to anybody.
That's what they always tell you. You better go public now. And in
a whole bunch of townships where they get 300 400 plus votes, not one Ron Paul over
and over and over and over again. So exactly what Bev said, look for happened. There is
no doubt there has been a chicanery, chicanery is a foot. I like chicanery and And people are talking to the the clerks and then the clerks are like, don't snitch.
Don't snitch.
Don't tell anybody.
If you see one Ron Paul vote.
Don't snitch.
Don't snitch.
So at this point in time, Alex is running a website called the Ron Paul
War Room.
It's a pretty standard like WordPress blog of the time, except the users could
register and then post whatever they wanted.
So there's a bunch of different authors posting various gripes about how too few people like
Ron Paul.
Sure.
Seems like a number of them are pretty defensive about the racist stuff he published in his
newsletter too, which makes sense.
Apparently someone posted on there about how Paul got screwed out of some votes in New
Hampshire, so Alex is all over the story.
This relates to a single town called Sutton, which is going to factor heavily into this
episode, and Alex is going to hinge an elaborate conspiracy on this one town.
How many people live in Sutton?
It's not tiny, but it's not huge also, sort of, but it's small.
It's a small town.
What happened in Sutton was that a family of folks on the Ron Paul War Room noticed that
they had voted for Paul, but in the media it was reported that he got zero votes in that town. There was an administrative error where
the clerk had sent the media the wrong number which was corrected before the clerk even
got to work the next day. It was a tiny bit of human error but because it was related
to Ron Paul whose most ardent supporters are weirdo conspiracists this became evidence
that the whole election was being stolen to prevent Ron Paul from easily winning
Which you would do right if people didn't just get in the way
We'll get into this more as the episode goes along
But that's what this is about right an administrative error that was quickly corrected in a town where Ron Paul got 31 out of
423 votes cast in the GOP primary when Alex mentions Bev there
He's talking about Bev Harris who's a noted crusader against electronic voting and enthusiastic participant in what Alex is gearing up to
do in this episode. She is basically a Ron Paul advocate more than she is an expert in
anything. It is a mess.
Alright.
Alright.
So yeah.
I wish and if I'm given the opportunity to recreate the universe, I don't know if I
will be, but if I'm given the opportunity, recreate the universe I don't know if I will be but if I'm given the opportunity
I will give a lot more weight to people when they say stuff like
Can't we just not with this like that should be almost a sacrosanct like as a as a species
We should all like hold in highest regard
If somebody says like can we just not do this and that should it
should count for these situations oh Ron Paul didn't get two votes can we please
just not do I thought you meant with this podcast no no no can we just not do
this I was just not do Ron Paul I understand and you know what you know
what fix it you know what it's it later but can we please just not be mad about
it but you know it's interesting is at this point it's unclear the extent to
which Ron Paul's actual campaign even knew about it or was activated about it. But you know what's interesting is at this point it's unclear the extent to which Ron Paul's actual campaign even knew about it or was activated about it or was mad
or was campaigning in New Hampshire at all. They were doing some campaigning. Sure. Ron
Paul wanted this one. But yeah it's I would say they shouldn't but the incentive is very
high very high. It's very high.
So we got Bev Harris coming in.
Sure.
And she and Alex are going to discuss in very responsible tones as this election administrative
error.
Sure.
Okay, let's go to Bev Harris.
Bev, break down exactly what we've seen developed here.
Oh boy, I just got off the phone with the town of Sutton.
Ron Paul got 31 votes,
not zero. I have it confirmed from the town clerk. I asked her why the discrepancy and
she said they simply failed to put the right number on the form they sent to the media.
Sure, it's accidental. It doesn't matter. This is unacceptable. Shut it down. The classic
method for rigging a hand count is to write
the wrong number on the form. Classic. Classic. Wait. Classic from whom? Everyone. This is
how they do it. Sorry? Everyone does it. But like one example. Classic. It's not in New
Hampshire. Oh never mind. You've got me. Based on Bev's reporting and based on everything
else you can tell here, all that happened was that the wrong number was conveyed to
the media.
There's no reason to jump to the conclusion that these 31 votes
were misreported in terms of official vote tallies,
but that's not a detail that's getting any attention here.
All we know is that someone didn't send the right number
to the media.
Well, it's not because...listen,
he didn't win the New Hampshire primary,
we knew we wouldn't, but if the media reports
that he got zero votes, then nobody's going to vote for him in the next primary. But if they report,
oh, he got 31 from Sutton, that's momentum we can take.
You know the old expression as goes Sutton,
as goes Sutton.
1800 people in 2024. That's the size of the town. So I mean, I do get that on
some level, that like, if you that like if you're if you're gonna
just say across the board, right, wipe his votes in order to demotivate the base or something.
Sure. Sure. Taking 31 out of something is not. It doesn't have the same like, oh god.
Really have the. That's you know, that's what we really need. Truly is like absolutely
100% real conspiracy that we all know that sounds as ridiculous in movie like as we can imagine
But they lose by 31 votes. Yeah, you know
You remember that movie steal them from the swing vote exactly. It's like that. Yeah
100% true evil conspiracy that just fucking forgot to steal Sutton's votes. Fuck.
Ah, we were gonna rule the world or whatever, but now I guess Obama should have president.
Now Ron Paul's in office. Fuck. What did we do? Oh no.
So all we really know here is that the wrong number was reported to the press and then it was corrected quickly.
But in the meantime, someone who voted for Ron Paul noticed that discrepancy and alerted Alex and his associates about it.
You get the strong sense that Alex is about to overreact about this. Maybe. And yeah, you're right. He is.
So Alex wants the details. Give me a...
How are they? How are they details?
Bev, tell me everything.
That's the evil plan.
Bev, this is huge breaking news. Stop, stop. This is huge breaking news. Again, tell everybody listening.
The name of the township. This is just one. You see, tell everybody listening the name of the township.
This is just one.
Within an hour, we're going to give us all the names.
This is huge breaking news.
It's the town of Sutton.
Now remember, they don't do counties in New Hampshire.
It's all done by townships.
Township of Sutton.
It's just town.
It's the town of Sutton, S-U-T-T-O-N.
I just got off the phone with Jennifer Call, who is the town clerk, and she confirmed
that Ron Paul actually did get 31 votes, not zero. Now understand something, this is more
votes than he got or was reported to have gotten in almost every place.
Yeah, the reason that Ron Paul got less votes ever is because he's very not popular. He's
an old asshole who has a bit of a racist past and sports policies that are extremely far to the right for most voters
He's won over a sliver of very vocal and aggressive folks on the left and right with his cool opposition to drug laws and his anti-war stance
So you see this appearance of popularity online
But in the real world he is not popular and it makes makes sense that he would have little, like it makes sense.
Like a Sutton would have 30 people who love Rumpal, they probably hang out together,
they go bowling, like these are a group of people.
Sure.
Yeah, it makes sense.
You notice in there that Bev Gade out this town clerk's name, which is interesting,
because this all led to an awful outcome for this woman.
For God's sakes.
As reported in the Concord Monitor, Jennifer Call was hit with a flood of harassment right
around the time this episode was airing.
From the article, quote, the assault picked up after lunch.
Paul supporters began phoning Call claiming to be from the media.
Others just yelled, saying she'd committed treason, fraud.
One person said she should be shot.
This all had a very severe effect on her.
Again, from the article, quote,
she went home and locked her doors.
She called her mother in North Carolina.
She cried.
The calls kept coming.
She unhooked her answering machine
and requested an unlisted number.
I was drained emotionally and physically, call said.
That's when I really started to freak out.
Thursday it hit me that most of these people
are not rational.
That's when I became scared.
It's like they're calling her home phone
and harassing her. It's crazy. This harassment picked up around lunch because that's when Alex's show aired when he and
Bev Harris put a target on her. It's an hour later in New Hampshire, so this lines up almost perfectly. And another detail
stood out from her telling of the story in the Concord Monitor. Quote, one person said he was on a nationally syndicated
radio station and he's given out my phone number
and they need to call the town of Sutton
to find out why there's voter fraud.
You imagine how many nationally syndicated radio shows
were talking about this at this immediate time?
Maybe one?
It seems like there's a small pool from which to, yeah.
And I think that this is kind of like poorly worded.
Like I don't think that she meant that Alex called her.
Right, right, I understand.
One person said he was on a nationally rated.
One person who was talking to her about the thing
said he heard through the national, yeah.
I assume that that's what this meant, being communicated.
I understood, yeah.
So it doesn't get much clearer cut than this.
Alex needed a narrative to distract away
from how unpopular Ron Paul is. so he decided to jump on this administrative error to use it as proof of voter fraud.
In the process, he put a real human in the crosshairs as a person who's to blame for screwing over Paul, and she had to pay the real consequences of his actions.
This dynamic exists in a lot of Alex's stories, but it's very often the case that the harm that's done is too obscure to end up being documented
Or he's vague enough to have plausible deniability that his actions didn't lead to this harassment
But what happened to Jennifer call happened to a lot of people because of Alex. Yeah, it's just that this one is pretty direct
Yeah
Yeah, yeah
It is it is strange that there's no like there's nothing to learn other than sometimes in this life in our society
Yours will just get exploded for no reason. Mm-hmm. Just no no rhyme no reason your life is just exploded today
Yeah, and that's a lot of times it's like
You know like if you look at it in the case in this case
It's someone who's just going about their business and someone else had a different agenda
and you were collateral damage to it.
Yep.
And that's bullshit.
Yeah, the idea of like acknowledging
that to a lot of the world, your personhood is non-existent.
That's difficult.
It's tough because you feel like you're a person
most of the time.
Yeah, your experience is generally of personness.
Being a person, yeah.
So Bev gives out her name again and makes some accusations. We caught this because our listeners
at Ron Paul War Room dot com an entire family, the parents that the out of the home, you
know, 20 something year old children, all five of them went down to vote and then they watched the results and it said zero baby.
And now you called the the the the town clerk.
Give us her name again.
Spell it.
Jennifer called C.A.L.L.
Just like telephone call.
Unbelievable.
It's unbelievable.
Why is that unbelievable?
The way that a hand count can be rigged is they and here's what they're doing in New
Hampshire.
They have, the people are counting everything
in public real nice.
They fill out a form in public real nice,
and then they transfer it to another form
and they call that a summary sheet
and that's the one they send in.
And so what happened is she said
that they did not transpose the number correctly
and put zero instead of 31. That
is unacceptable as an answer."
So they're very clearly directing the audience to miss call and they're loading them up with
the accusation that whatever mistake her office made was an intentional act to rig the primary
against Ron Paul. This is just overall top to bottom unacceptable behavior from both
of them.
And Bev is just wrong. She says that the
form that Call sent out had a zero for Ron Paul, but it didn't. From the Concord Monitor article,
quote, the slot next to Paul's name on the original return sheet said 31, but a space on Call's return
next to Paul's name remained blank. She didn't write in a zero. She forgot to enter a number.
I know that sounds like splitting hairs, but it's not. Because writing in a zero implies some level of intent.
Maybe you'd actually don't have any intent,
but you could, it looks like you had to take an action.
Whereas it's much easier to understand
something being left blank as being an accident.
Alex and Bev are incentivized to fudge
whatever details they can to make this
seem more like voter fraud because their candidate sucks
and they can't accept that.
Because that ruins their whole thing.
Yeah.
Oh no, our guy sucks.
Yeah, she could have hit tab twice, you know,
on the spreadsheet and then missed the sell
and then 31 just got disappeared.
Or it's brutal.
Or if it's just by hand, it's easy to just-
Totally.
Pass over it.
And not for nothing, it got corrected quickly,
and there's no indication this went anywhere
other than the media, so.
Yeah, I think it is a testament to Alex's evil and power,
that it's like, God, do we really have to, we do.
We have to get into the fucking weeds on 31 assholes who voted for Ron fucking Paul
in an election where he lost by several hundred million.
Well, the other-
Several hundred million is how much Ron Paul lost by.
And we're mad about 31 votes.
Yeah, the other thing that is made,
the point that's made in these articles
from around that time that I think is really true
is like, you can fuck up like this when it's Giuliani you
can fuck up like this if it's you know Romney sure but you cannot do like this
with Ron Paul his audience is all conspiracy theorists right they're all
paranoid weirdos right not all but you know what I mean it's it's you have to
be on you have to be right every time right Right, they're gonna exploit the fuck out of it, right, and that's what you're seeing here. Yeah
So Alex obviously this is grounds for a recount. We gotta we gotta do a
That is unbelievable bad Harris what needs to happen
I think they need to throw all the results out now and have a recount at least in the 20%
results out now and have a recount at least in the 20 percent. I think it's bad because let me tell you what else, if they have a recount it will cost
Ron Paul about $67,000 and there is a problem with chain of custody.
I'm sorry I've got another phone ringing but I'm going to ignore it but I'm sorry it's
coming over your line if it is.
No maybe breaking news, pick it up, pick it up.
No, no, it's okay.
I'll tell you, I can't even get all kinds of things from all kinds of citizens who ask me. news pick it up pick it up okay now in New Hampshire we are not comfortable with the
chain of custody for the recount ballot so it's a toss up whether he should spend $67,000
to get a recount because it'll draw a national attention to the cheating and then if they cheat the recount
We catch them again bad. They got it. They do it. They have to do it statewide
Because what because if you do a spot check recount it can be gained very easily understand
Okay, so ironically Alex would end up getting that recount that he wanted
Yeah, his audience help raise the money for the Paul campaign and Dennis Kucinich from the Democrat side also joined in for the call for the recount
and it went down. In the GOP primary, the only result of the recount was they found one more
vote for Romney. Hey! That's it. Great. On the Democrat side, they found that there
was one poll worker who had miscounted votes by hand, but resulted in both Obama and Clinton
gaining votes. So
ultimately the recount didn't change anything. Sure. But there was one person who messed
up in a very narrow sense. I like that. And has no effect on Ron Paul. Yeah. So Alex is
kind of giving up the game there a little bit. He wants a recount because it would get national
attention. Right. He has to know deep down the Ron Paul sucks and that a recount isn't
going to turn up a bunch of votes for him, but this is a great opportunity to grandstand and not for nothing. All attention for Ron Paul is
positive for him. Yep. They are entwined in a way that, you know, is unfortunate. Yeah.
Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. I mean, cause Ron Paul doesn't get votes so much as both of them get a advertising base, you
know?
I mean, Ron Paul, I think has a gold thing.
Sure.
But I mean, yeah, you know, it's like you're not going to accrue enough votes to do a thing,
but the more people you have who would vote for you is the more people who are going to
listen to Alex's show and buy his stuff and your stuff.
That's not fully true.
It is nationally true.
Sure.
You know, Ron Paul could get elected to the House of Representatives.
Sure.
Locally, sure.
Create enough of a base.
Right.
Right.
To get into an office.
But in terms of nationally, absolutely not.
Right.
Right.
It is just advertising.
Right.
When Alex wants national attention for Ron Paul,
he's looking for national attention for Alex.
Yes.
Yes.
Because he's fighting a good fight. That's not why national attention for Alex. Yes. Yes. Because he's fighting
a good fight. That's not why. No, it is not. No. So, uh, uh, Paul, uh, Ron Paul, uh,
what about him? He got worse results from, from the machine areas. So I put together
a spreadsheet and put it on the website for everyone to use to put their own results into
which outlined everyone in the 250, you know, New Hampshire townships
and which voting system they used. And there is also a discrepancy. The voting machines
gave him worse results than the hand counts.
That's the same thing with Howard Dean, wasn't it?
Yes, it is. And by the way, the discrepancy there was they gave Ron Paul about two and a half percent
worse results than the hand count and they gave Hillary five percent better
results than the hand count which is exactly what she beat a Barack Obama at
so Alex is off there yeah Glenn beat Obama by about 2.6% he's saying that her
lead matches the machine counting because he's trying to say that the
machine stole the election for Hillary. This is all very confusing because the marquee example that they have here is from Sutton, which was hand counted,
so this all seems like a big mess. There's weird machine fraud conspiracies going on here,
but the specific you have is a hand count. I don't fucking know. Now, bigger picture,
the voting machines didn't give Ron Paul worse results than hand counts. He happened to do worse
in areas that used voting machines, most likely because they were the cities and larger population
centers. In more rural areas, you're more likely to have towns that use hand counting
and you're more likely to find fringe-ass libertarian Paul fans. The possibility that
there could be another explanation for the hand count towns versus machine tally towns
is never even considered. It's just accepted, wholly unsupported and unproven as proof that the globalists are screwing over Ron Paul using
the machines. But then again, Sutton is hand counted, so the plot is muddy. Very muddy.
But you should just know that everything is fucked. There's chicanery.
You know, here's the fun thing, though, I will say about these people, right? And this
is the hard thing, like, so
with, uh, with the left, you know, with Howard Dean and that stuff, you know, Occam's razor
wins out, right? Like, uh, this country hates the left. It always has. It's always going
to. It hates us, right? So that's fine. It's not a conspiracy. They just hate it, right?
But with the far right and with the JBS guys, that's, it's not the same because they've
had so much power in the United States
for so long.
So it makes sense for them a little bit to be like,
I don't know, we could probably just take it.
Like that's how they've done it, you know?
Well, sure.
And I think that even beyond that or behind that,
there is the certainty of being right.
And like someone like Alex has this position
that like obviously Ron Paul is right about everything and everybody likes him because he's right about everything
Right, right, right. So these numbers showing terrible support for him can't possibly be right. Yeah
And and see and I think I think that has us
I think that has so much to do with how we view our own history like moving backwards and it's and not like just Americans but the human race how we do it is like
people can't understand that it's far more reasonable for uh Ron Paul in in like the past
because we have to remember that we continually losing voting electorate as we go backwards as
we go back and back and back you say oh Ron Paul's only voter base was white men and you're like ha ha
He ran this country for a hundred and fifty years sure you understand so that it's reasonable sure
But you have to be you have to pump the brakes
Because Ron Paul isn't doing any of this stuff. No, this is Alex on Ron Paul's behalf true
So I mean granted he does get a recount in New Hampshire. Jesus Christ.
But why not? Yeah, but I mean yeah go for it. Alex's fans are fundraising it. Honestly,
67K isn't even that much. No. And it's not that much work. I'm sure somebody got an extra day.
Maybe there's some OT involved. It's probably for the best. Right. Right. Yeah. Yeah. But all of
the statements and all of the energy and the feeling that you know
It's easy to ascribe to the Paul campaign sure is really coming out of Alex as a defecto mouthpiece for them
That's true. So, you know, who's to say how much they would?
You know absolutely sign off on maybe a lot maybe most you'll see so Bev has some more breaking news for Alex
More breaking news.
I haven't even put this on my website yet.
How's down to great grief.
I have a report coming to me.
Now yesterday we broke the story about this one sole source provider program in every voting
machine in New Hampshire.
You also broke the news that Hillary was kicking Barack Obama and Ron Paul specifically poll
watchers out.
Oh, this is it.
That was widely reported on the internet. I was not able to confirm that because. and Ron Paul specifically, Paul Watcher's out. Oh, this is it.
That was widely reported on the internet.
I was not able to confirm that because
what do you think citizens need to learn?
Let me stop you.
The Boston Globe did report it.
The Boston Globe did report it.
Good, good, okay, good.
Okay.
So that clip reveals a weird instinct that Alex has.
Yeah.
Bev says that she has exclusive news to break
and instead of just letting her talk,
he jumps in and tries to guess what the news is is referring to something that she allegedly posted on her website prior
But she said that she hasn't even posted about this thing yet
So that can't be what it is
Then Alex comes up with this story about Hillary kicking Ron Paul pole watchers out which Bev says is just a rumor
She can't substantiate and Alex shoots back that it was in the Boston Globe to that I say was it really was it?
I think it wasn't oh, but Bev understands the game and Alex shoots back that it was in the Boston globe. To that I say, was it really? Was it?
I think it wasn't.
Oh.
But Bev understands the game.
Alex wants this narrative put forth.
She tried to protest since she can't back up the claim
and Alex has asserted his dominance,
indicating that he's not gonna let this go.
And so she demers like, oh good.
Also she's off the hook.
Like it's not her.
Right, Megan any claims.
Yeah, hey, if Alex wants to claim
that the Boston globe made something up on his show. I've said my piece that I can't corroborate it. So whatever. Yeah.
Yeah. Done and done. This is hardly the first time that she's talked to Alex though. So
I have no doubt that she understands that when Alex says that something was reported
in some outlet, there's no reason to assume it actually was. But when he says something
like that, you know, he's not going to budge. So you might as well just let him have his
way, move forward. And like you said, there's no personal loss.
Yeah.
That if it turns out to not be true.
I got no blood in this.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
Yeah.
So anyway, she does have some big news though.
That Alex derailed.
All right.
You ready for this?
Yes.
I don't think you are.
I actually agree.
I think you need to sit down.
Okay.
Ready for this?
Sit down.
Okay, go ahead.
LHS associates. The firm that programmed every voting machine in New Hampshire.
I have just gotten a call and I'm waiting the fact confirmation that one of the key people
there has a criminal record.
Oh.
It's a cocaine trafficker.
Oh my God.
You know, with not just that, but with complaints to the Attorney General already
for election related complaints. Just like they always catch Daibold and others with convicted
hackers and others. I mean, how many times have we caught hardcore crooks working inside the
elections at key places? So that's Bev's big bombshell here.
And you can hear that Alex is getting,
you can get a giddiness from both of them really.
And Alex is, he's scandalized by this news.
So LHS is the company that services many of the
vote counting machines in New Hampshire
and a few other states in the Northeast.
Bev had gotten a tip that someone there
was arrested as a cocaine trafficker. this is very relevant news considering that the
big scandal they're supposed to be covering is that Ron Paul got screwed over by a hand count.
Right. This all traces back to someone named Ken Hajjar who people are saying was arrested for
drug possession and intent to distribute. I was able to find a blog post on this on a website
called OpEd News from January 9th,
but I think that it's piggybacking on Bev's coverage because it was posted at 9.30pm,
which is after this.
On this blog, there's a link to what appears to be a court document that very well may be
real, reflecting that Ken Hajar pled guilty to an offense listed as quote, sale slash
CND in September 1987.
That's 21 years before this episode was recorded.
It's unclear what the precise crime was,
but it does appear that it may have been something with drugs
since I think CND stands for commission on narcotic drugs.
I'm not sure exactly,
but if you search for that specific charge,
all you get is other blogs talking about Canada drug.
Yeah, that makes sense.
I've found a ton of blogs talking shit about this and none of them specify what this means.
But we do know that.
According to this document, he was sentenced to no more than 12 months in jail but got
a deferred prosecution, meaning that if he could just not get re-arrested during the
year of probation, he wouldn't do any time.
This would, if, like this guy was actually a cocaine trafficker, they would not get
this lenient of a sentence
This is the kind of charge you get if you were someone had a little more drugs on you than the cops thought were for personal use
So they decide to charge you with intent to distribute
I had friends get hit with that back in the day in 87 in 87 in 87 if he had any
Crack on him. He'd be in jail forever. Sure, right, but. So he's got Coke so we know he's white.
I have no idea about this guy. I don't know anything about him except for he was a sales
person for this company. Yeah, you got arrested in 87. Oh my god. So now there's another problem
here which is that the person who works at LHS is named Ken Hajjar but this indictment
is for someone named Kananth Hajjar. It's
hard to tell if this is a typo or if this is actually a different person or if that's
what Ken's short for. It's entirely possible, but I can't find any indication either way.
I tend to think it is a typo if it's a real document, or actually that's what his full
name is. That is entirely possible. But more importantly, I don't really care. I don't
think a minor drug arrest 21 years in the past precludes someone from being able to be employed by a company that
provides support for elections. A further point is that one of the other sources cited
in the op ed news article claims that a jar doesn't even work on New Hampshire elections
with LHS. So this seems entirely irrelevant. Even more to the point, he's in sales and
marketing with the company. He's not even the person like going around and servicing
these machines.
This is just people grasping at straws, trying to use one person's supposed criminal record
to paint an entire company as criminal.
And it's pathetic because at this point, Alex is supposed to be this libertarian opposing
drug laws.
He's making a big deal out of a piss at drug arrest 21 years in the past just because it's
convenient for him.
Yeah, this actually care.
This clip is so much like this is the addict though. Like this is the addiction
part. That feeling that they just... When Alex said oh my god. Oh man. Whatever he mumbled in the back.
Yeah, absolutely. Oh, I knew. You know, like that is that chemical, giving you everything that you want. That is so much that dragon.
We watched the documentary about
American conspiracy, Danny Caesillero, that whole thing.
And it is so much like, oh, you get so addicted
to that feeling.
It's such a rush over and over and over again
that you're willing to give up everything else for it.
You find whatever you're looking for behind every door.
Oh, yeah. So you know what I're looking for behind every door. Oh, yes.
So you know what I'm looking for behind a door?
Beth?
Dev?
The highway.
Beth.
Oh.
I was a highway man.
Along the coast roads on this road.
It's been a while.
It has.
I missed it.
Red alert. Red alert, ladies and gentlemen, coast to coast,
border to border. I don't care if you're in Germany and China and Mexico in the Netherlands
in Africa, you're listening right now. The evidence of the fraud spread the word everywhere.
It's got to go supernova on the web. If you're in Germany, you got to care about
this. The real fucking Luton Sutton I have no fucking loot. It's Sutton.
Sutton, New Hampshire, baby.
That's ground zero for this is our war.
This is Fort Sutton.
Sutton, sir.
Sup, Dupter.
And if you, I don't give a shit.
You're in Australia.
This matters to you.
You're in Brazil.
This matters to you.
Your water may flush the other direction,
but not a democracy.
I don't think it matters.
I don't think so. No, it's a little bit dramatic. Yeah.
But nice to hear the highway man again. It is always so good.
So Alex reports this story,
re reports it right and embellishes a bit of details along the way.
Last night we got the tip at Ron Paul, war room.com.
We talked to the family this morning and they're saying, well, the county officials are telling
us wait and only talk to them.
No, no, no.
Well, the good news is that Harris called that very same township, they have towns not
counties there, but it's set up in the same system, the city clerk, and she said too bad
right before airtime that yes, and this is the big news, yes, 30 plus votes in that township for paul that that's just what they're
saying
secret they got all these people coming forward and i voted it might even be
bigger
how do you have
accidentally
is on the back of this and into the cocaine uh... trafficker and boy this is
with i just got the backside secret scoop is i can be trusted
we can't say that much but this is going to this is just, it's always, it's always cocaine dealers. I thought you run
the government, who runs America. But it's black ops folks.
So you can see how Alex has taken this one thing and now he's speculating wildly that
it's probably because there's actually more votes than that. Even we know. Yeah. He's
insisting on saying 30 plus because it's fun because it's plus one. I was literally just thinking, really, you're not going to 30 plus 31 on me. Are you really
going to do that? He's going to do it. Yeah.
And you can see how Alex is working on incorporating the story about the cocaine dealer into this
developing narrative. This is a great piece to have in play because you can weave in ideas
about the CIA running the drug trade. So maybe this guy's working for the CIA.
Totally.
I've seen some blogs suggesting that that's why he got a deferred sentence for his arrest,
which is a convenient way for them to explain away this light sentence.
Always nice.
For this to work as part of the conspiracy, he needs to be moving tons of cocaine, and
the punishment doesn't fit that.
So there needs to be another layer of conspiracy added on top to make sure all the details
fit.
Yeah. It's great. Yeah.
So yeah, the narrative is taking shape. Sure. You can definitely see that. And now it's
time to build. Get out your Legos. All right. What are we doing? Where are we going with
this? One thing I would encourage your listeners to do is to go to the website or go to what,
you know, whatever website has these results and just look at how many
little townships in New Hampshire even have as many as 31 votes for Ron Paul.
And that's the point.
If you wonder how much he really got.
And by the way, there are 31 of townships that show zero and you'll have hundreds and
hundreds of votes and he gets zero even if he's at 8%
then he should get 8 out of 100 instead of zero out of 300, 500, 600 folks this stinks
absolutely to the gates of heaven.
So they did a recount and it turns out Ron Paul just sucks.
This is all just completely unfounded speculation that Alex and Bev are engaging in.
They have one example of an administrative error that they can't even prove affected official vote totals,
only the number reported to the media. From that jumping off point, they're
taking all of the places where Paul performed poorly and saying, the same
thing must have happened here because it's all a conspiracy against our own Paul.
This is the kind of thing you should expect to see from Alex. Just utter
garbage narrative building meant to push his fake reality onto the audience presented as factual research truth. What makes me mad about
this whole interview is Bev is going on about how she only reports what she can prove and she's a
stickler for details, but here she is saying that Ron Paul must have gotten more votes in these
towns where he performed poorly. This is something that I want to point out about these folks.
For them, being a stickler for the details or only reporting what I can prove, that isn't an actual statement of policy
or practice. It's a description of their brand. She markets herself as someone who's careful
about this stuff, so people will take it more seriously when she says shit like,
imagine how many more votes Ron Paul got. Yeah, it is. It is so much like just the more weight
you put on a, oh, I won't say that means the more power you get
when you say bullshit.
Yeah.
And that's a branding exercise more than it is anything else.
Yeah, it's not a reality thing, yeah.
So let's keep building.
Let's go.
Another thing to look for as you're looking at the detail
results is looking the ones where they say other votes.
In the Democratic call, I noticed that the town of Manchester reported 570 votes
of other. What is 570 people voting for other?
You're guaranteed to strong fall in Barack Obama.
They have to shift it from bin to bin so it matches the number of voting people who
showed up.
Are you an idiot? I think maybe. A lot of places probably only list the top three or four
vote getters and that leaves a ton of votes
that end up getting summed up as quote other.
For example, like at least 20 people got more than 10 votes
in the Democratic primary and that's not even counting
the 2,517 votes for right in candidates.
50 bucks says one of them is Homer Simpson.
I would bet.
Yeah. If you look at the New York Times coverage of the results,
there are eight candidates listed,
then the rest of the others are lumped in as other.
But that doesn't mean that there's anything being hidden.
Manchester is the most populous city in New Hampshire,
so you can easily understand how there are more people there,
so more opportunities for folks to vote
for less successful candidates.
So just for fun, I was able to find the itemized breakdown of votes by town for
the Democratic primary.
It's very easy to find 500 votes that would go into the other category in
Manchester. Yeah.
There were 192 votes for Dennis Kucinich alone.
There were 56 for Biden, 45 for Mike Gravel, 32 for Chris Dodd.
And here's the thing, you can vote for Republicans in the Democratic
primary in New Hampshire. Sure. It doesn't end up affecting the Republican primary, but
you can still vote for them. So John McCain got 144 votes. That'll teach him. Romney got
101 and Ron Paul got 38. Did better in the Democratic. Actually, no, I'm sorry. That's
a different city. I understand what you're saying. But yes, I'm with you. So these folks that I just listed combined for 608 votes in the town of Manchester, all
votes that likely would have been neatly compiled into the other category.
This isn't serious behavior that Bev is displaying here.
If she's someone who has any familiarity with elections, you would know that that's what's
going on, not that they're secreting away votes for Ron Paul in the other category.
She's not a sincere actor in this information space. She's clearly someone who's an advocate for Ron Paul pretending
to just be I can only want to report what I can to approve. It's nonsense.
That is pre like Bodie McBow face levels of the internet will just name shit kind of stuff
though. So I mean when you read that list of candidates, it is kind of funny how many
of them are real people in retrospect because now if you're looking at like top vote getters for non-major
candidates, it is going to be like fucking Furiosa.
You know?
Right, right.
Yeah.
I think you probably would find a lot of that in the one or two vote getters.
Right, in 2008.
Now, what's interesting in 2008 though is there's also like a couple people
Who were like listed and they're real people, but I have no idea who they are
Okay, so there's some people who time has just forgotten or or it's just a guy who is like you know what I'm gonna get my message out
I wish Ron Paul was someone who I looked at the name and thought who is that yeah, that would but unfortunately
That's how where we live that would be nice. But unfortunately, that's not where we live. That would be nice.
So, Alex wants Bev to demand the election be thrown out.
But I mean, Bev, but people really respect you, so I need you to specifically say, what
is it when they admit they gave him zero and it's 31?
That election's thrown out right there.
That election is, look, they're always going to say it was an error.
Guess what?
When someone embezzles money, they always have a plausible excuse for how this and that
happen.
It is not acceptable.
What is their job?
They have one job on election night and that is to result numbers for what?
12 candidates?
That's it.
Folks, you've got 350-something votes in the town and 31 of them are for Ron
Paul, but they can't get that on the paper.
If Bev thinks that all the town clerk had to do on the night of the primary is that
then she's a fucking idiot. She's minimizing the amount of responsibilities this person
had in order to make it seem like there was Clearly a conspiracy going on here as opposed to an understandable administrative error
Bev has literally zero evidence that there's anything nefarious going on
But that's the line that she's going with because she's not an expert
She's an advocate and Alex has some basic details wrong. He's saying there were 350 something votes in the town when there's actually
971
423 of them were in the Republican primary, but that
town held primaries for both parties on the same day. Alex is fudging the numbers a little
bit to make it look like the clerk had less to do that night and to increase the proportion
of votes that Ron Paul got. It's sloppy work all around, but I mean the problem here of course is that even if you are 100% correct
even if this like
Percentage total of of alex's which is closer to 10% so we'll we'll leave aside the 3% and we'll move it closer to 10% sure
It's not a demographically representative place, but fuck it. We'll say it is
It's it's not Fraud or anything like that, but fuck it. Let's get rid of all anything. Ron Paul
loses by a hundred million fucking votes! Okay. Just to be clear on that.
31. Just to be clear on all of this. Okay. So look, if you missed five votes
sure out of that 31, that's understandable. How is that
anymore or less understandable than 30? It's not but Alex says
so and I think he immediately realizes that stupid. Yeah, that
makes no sense. Look, if they if they miss five out of 31, it
could be believable, but all of them bad. Right. And you have
to actually write a circle of zero in the spot.
It doesn't matter to me if it's plausible.
I think we have to get to the point where we stop expecting excuses.
What about these other towns?
I guarantee you the other places he got zero, he didn't get zero.
And I guarantee you those towns where it says 500 and something other I bet my bottom dollar eighty percent
Of that's wrong ball and Barack Obama. What do you say, babe?
Well, I can't speak to that because I am conservative and only report exactly what I can prove
Stay there. We gotta play final second with that virus. He's gonna pop back in in the third hour with all the new stuff
She's learned this is Armageddon
This is Armageddon. This is Armageddon.
This is Armageddon.
This is Armageddon.
There is a there's an underappreciated thing that I I want to point out more
and Alex is a bit dramatic.
Oh, like, yeah, this is Armageddon is such a,
like you should be, that's cringy.
You should be ashamed looking back on that
and being like, well, maybe I oversold that a little.
I think, here's what I think, like truly,
here's what I think people have fucked up, right?
Sports Talk Radio is where Alex was meant to be, you know?
Like now we realize, now people realize that all sports talk radio
is filled with insane people who say shit like,
I bet, and then you know what, if you look at his stats,
I bet 80% my bottom dollar, you know, that's all,
that's all it's for.
Wrestling commentator maybe?
Totally, yeah, absolutely, that's all that it's for.
You're not supposed to do that for politics though.
Yeah, it does, It it cheapens.
Yeah.
So you can hear in that clip the bullshit branding Bev is trying to hide behind this.
I only say what I can prove nonsense.
She has no evidence that they wrote in a zero and reporting on this event has been clear
that what happened was that the slot on that form was just left blank.
Yeah.
However, it's much more suspicious if someone went out of their way to write a zero.
So that's what Bev is going with even though her stated policy of only reporting what you can prove get the fuck out of here
Also, Alex's theory makes no sense. I would argue that it is more suspicious if you leave out five
I think it's the polar opposite
I I mean any any conversation about that always reminds me of like the first guy to measure
the height of Mount Everest, uh, measured it at exactly 20,000 feet and was like, well,
I can't do that.
So for a long, long time in textbooks, it was 20,002 feet because that made him look
so fucking precise.
Look at how fucking precise I am.
Uh, and that's just like, what are you talking
about removing five votes is going to change? What are you talking about? At least you would
have 26. No, but I mean, that is your exit. That's the point. The five is the ones that
matter. Yeah, right. Well, yeah. And it's so much easier to just be like, except in a mistake of all of them.
Right.
And Alex is saying the opposite.
The complete opposite.
It's own reasonable to accept it a mistake of five if you did that mistake on purpose.
And I think that the reason is because everything but what happened has to be presented as more
reasonable than what actually happened.
Yeah.
Because this has to be the most suspicious thing ever.
And Alex kind of ends up saying stupid shit like that. Anyway, Bev was watching
CNN and she saw some terrible analysis of this that really freaked her out. Okay. I
was watching the CNN coverage last night and I was shocked and let me tell you the part
shocked me. But there was a person with a huge pie wedge in the pie slice graph and sometimes he was beating Juliani 2 to 1
in the pie slice and they had the names of everybody except this person was the gray
unnamed person.
And that was Paul.
What the heck was that?
That's because the computers were coming in with the real info and they had to take his
name off.
Look early on he was beating Juliani.
Well, and they have Republican rights so they had to differentiate the red and then
they just have a great huge price slice that they kept taking the camera off when it got
bigger without a name on it.
It's not even red.
I mean it was, and it wasn't just for a minute.
This was on, this was for like an hour.
How in the world do you justify not naming a person in the price life when everyone else
has a name and having it a different color?
It was the most blatant thing I've, I mean, it was just so visual.
It was, it was really one of those things that just makes you sick.
You just go on.
I don't care what candidate it is, every candidate deserves to have his name in the same situation
as every other candidate. Why would you say that?
Especially when he's beating, he's beating Giuliani, but they're showing his name now.
Now that's where they had a chance to rig it.
Sure. So I wasn't able to find this CNN coverage itself.
Sure.
I can't speak to this, but I would assume that maybe the
pie slice that was gray was votes that are yet to come in or
something like that.
There's something that explains this that Bev is either missing
or intentionally misleading about.
But this is this is also where you really got a you got a squint
and recognize that they're arguing about him beating Giuliani. Yeah. And Giuliani not in the race. No, he was. No,
he was not the front runner. No, that's what I'm saying. You had McCain and Romney
who were the ones who, you know, were relevant. Yeah. And Alex is insisting
that they must have gone through this elaborate of a conspiracy to keep Ron
Paul out of third place. Yep.
It's just, I don't fucking know, man.
Yeah, they did the same thing to Ben Carson.
He was gonna, he was gonna get third or whatever it was.
He got pulled.
Yep. Yep.
So Alex lays out the talking points here of the, you know, what the storyline is.
Sure.
Look, I'm gonna make it clear for new listeners.
We just proved that they
gave him zero in a town where he had 31 and that's what they're saying. And there's all
these other towns that show zero or 500 plus here, 200 plus there, uh, where, and we said
over talking about that would make Paul a majority. We need to know who that other is.
This election all needs to be thrown out put on hold now I do not
want to see book you know this be a replay a bush in 2000 bed where where
gore sits out or Kerry 2004 we can't have Ron Paul sit out I mean it'd be one
thing if we think there's fraud and he showed double in the polls what he
actually got it's another thing when we've caught him red-handed or when we
catch him with convicted traffickers running things.
What? Right? What? Yeah. Yeah.
I feel like Bev has what it like how would I put it? Okay can you imagine
watching the Wizard of Oz? I have. Right okay now imagine watching The Wizard of Oz? I have. Right, okay, now imagine watching The Wizard of Oz
and then Dorothy sees The Wizard and goes,
ah, and then just runs away, end of movie.
You know, like, it is so much like, oh, oh, late,
oh, listen, let me pull the curtain back,
it's fine, it's TV is, I understand.
It looks like it makes sense.
But if you go there and you watch it, you go,
oh no, these people are, oh, I got it, yeah.
Like it's, it is so much like you just don't understand.
You're just, it's so close to you though.
You're like right up, you say hi to the wizard
and then you run away instead of like pulling the curtain back.
Well, and you're intentionally misleading about the wizard.
Well, I mean, after you met the wizard.
And blurring details about the wizard.
After you met the wizard.
Making shit up about the wizard's plans.
You saw that he was scary, so you ran away.
But then later on, you were like, man, he wasn't that scary.
So you got to make it bigger when you tell other people.
Otherwise, they're going to think you're an idiot
for just running away.
We've made up a story about what happened in this town, and now we're saying that it
happened everywhere, and it was done by a cocaine trafficker.
So we've got quite a narrative that's been built up.
It's escalated pretty quick.
Now my argument is that there was an administrative error that happened in this town in a very
limited sense, and it was corrected immediately.
She forgot to write down yes 31.
But this could not possibly have been human error.
What did this city clerk, the township clerk, what did she say to you when you said how
did this happen?
He said it was human error.
I'm sorry human error doesn't cut it.
You could say human error about anything.
And it just so happened to be Ron Paul.
Well, and 31...
Don't they even add up the number of...
Actually, in New Hampshire, they require that they do what's called a reconciliation
plan. Is that true?
On that form, they have to say how many people showed up and how many votes showed up.
It's easier than balancing...
If you're 31 off, why don't you do something?
It's easier than balancing your checkbook.
Oh, it's not.
This is basic arithmetic.
And it's basically, we had 350 people walk in the door to vote,
and we had this many votes show up.
There's no use for this kind of stuff.
And the question then becomes how many other places...
How many other places? This is what someone who can only only reports what they
can prove would be talking like this is someone who's real just by the books,
very serious and careful.
I think that this,
she actually brings up a good point and that there probably are pretty good
internal mechanisms in terms of balancing vote counts.
And that would be what is sent
to the official numbers. There may not be these Byzantine double check things in numbers
that get sent to the media. They might just make a copy of the forms and whatever and
send it off to the media to report on.
It's more about speed than it is about accuracy to the media.
Right. So this to me is even like cut more of an indication
that it probably was just these numbers that got sent to the media. Yeah. And they're pretending
like it was an actual vote theft or whatever. That's just, I don't know. It's a, it's dirty.
I mean, you know, like part of my argument so much often comes down to like, I understand all the reasons that it's not true,
but follow me on the path to it is true.
Are you telling me these all powerful people
stole 31 votes from Sutton?
What are they doing?
Right.
What are they doing on the daily?
Like how do you have time to destroy the world
and get to Sutton?
And they had to then cover their tracks and make the
recount appear that they didn't steal anything from anywhere else or they only stole from
Sutton. It's yeah, it's just believing any of this is real creates a whole bunch of really
bizarre avenues. Truly like the ultimate argument so often for people should really come down to like,
people are more likely to take the path of least resistance
and the more power you have,
the more people love giving you the path of least resistance,
the more you get gift bags just for showing up places,
you know?
Like everything about the more power you have
should be more about how people go,
I'm gonna do less work.
I'm not going to do this insane thing like go to Sutton.
Broke people go to Sutton. People trying to build shit go to Sutton.
Or people like Alex and Bev go there to exploit a mistake that was made.
The type of person who's trying to get national attention for a thing that doesn't normally get national attention right?
So you and you're talking about the people with power you're talking about the imagined
Globalists they are the they would it it makes yeah, yeah
It's I appreciate trying to bring some thought into it
Yeah, it's just you know in the real world her ideas aren't persuasive
No, they are not they fall apart
You know in the real world her ideas aren't persuasive. No, they are not they fall apart
Whether you look at it from a critical lens or if you look at it from the why would the globalist do this lens no matter what? But she's always so
Specific when she says she only says things that she can verify right it's a good brand
Yeah, but look I find her argument on persuasive, but there's another reason why I'm probably saying what I'm saying
Okay, that's that I'm a coward.
No, that's not true.
I mean, we just have a mafia running things, and it's time for the public to come to grips
with this, Bev.
Yeah, I think what the biggest thing I see is it's a scary concept that a lot of people
rejected outright and just, I can't think about that.
You know, they just feel like, because you know what, it's the the one way road, Alex, once you see it, you never turn back. You know, nothing ever fools you
again. Now, now some people will say, well, then why vote? We have to engage this process
and watch it so we can expose it. Look, in five years, the majority of Americans in major
polls, 85 plus percent, believers fraud now by the government and by the corporations. Well, soon it's going to be 99% and soon we're going to go arrest
all these people.
It sounds just like the present day there. You know, everyone's waking up.
That one's really everyone's waking up and soon just a few more people. Once they wake
up, it'll be game over for the globalists and the Patriots can arrest these crooks.
It's always the same story. We're always almost there. We're winning and losing simultaneously. It's, uh, yeah,
right around the corner, right around the corner. All we need to do is get my show
out to more people and that will wake up more people to the point where we get to the amount
of people woken up that we need in order to defeat the devil.
You know, the more I think about it, the more I prefer the globalists who steal votes from Sutton
to run the things than all the stuff we have now.
Because that's such a personal touch.
You know, like they're going to,
I mean, here, you know they're sending some ass,
like some flunky.
I disagree.
Some flunky.
In the real world, there's a Biden surrogate going to steal votes
But in this world, it's the globalists themselves. See I like it
I disagree with liking this because it leads me to believe that we have
Fully incompetent globalists true that are in charge sure because if anyone wanted to steal shit
You'd have to have like three or four votes there.
Yeah.
So anybody who is like, I voted for them, you couldn't, you wouldn't be able to do it.
If you have zero, then all you have to have is one person who says I voted for them and
the whole thing falls apart.
If you're stealing it, you got to have a couple of votes.
No, and we just, it's just like, we know how people steal these elections with like the
dictators and shit.
You win like 95% and then you publicly murder the guy who ran against you
Somebody else did it no idea. Yeah, so Bev takes her leave and Alex
Ways some time and then gets to some calls sure And we get a familiar face and friend call in
to chime in. All right. Let's go to Charles and Louisiana then Jason. Charles, you're
on the air my friend. Go ahead.
Mr. Jones. Yes, sir.
Yes, sir.
I'd like to know something. I always agree with you and everything, but I'm starting
to wonder about Ron Paul not making a gripe. Why isn't he really getting more forceful
about this? People's got faith in
him. He needs to start griping about this a lot more. I'll bring this to the fore. Well,
I mean, the New Hampshire's only been over for 12 hours. So they're studying it. They
got to be careful. They got to analyze. Yeah, they gotta be careful. Old gentleman, the gentleman
from Louisiana Charles. I he's worried that Ron Paul is not aggressive enough. I think
all conspiracy sound more believable
with a Cajun accent.
Yep.
A little more palatable.
Yeah.
It's a fun accent.
Why is he doing that?
I don't know, man.
I don't know.
Tell me more.
I'm worried he's not making a grade.
Me too now.
I don't know why, but me too.
So Alex, one of the things that you always see when he's developing a narrative more
or less in real time is you'll see constant repetition of the thing in order to beat
out the little touch points along the way. And so here is another
one of these.
Ron Paul openly, at every level, was cheated in New Hampshire, not just his poll numbers being double what he actually got, not just that he got in dozens of Township zero votes, not just that they show 500, 600,
200, 300 uncounted votes or other, not just that they took his name off the pie chart
on CNN. We have a major township saying that he got zero votes.
Witnesses came forward and said, we voted for him.
And they said, okay, there are a bunch of votes for him.
Caught red handed, it just went up on prisonplanet.com
right now.
So there's some points here.
Ron Paul's poll numbers were artificially high
because Alex is going off things like online polling polling which severely exaggerated Paul's real world popularity.
He was very popular with people who were too online in 2008 but that didn't translate
to actual voters.
Pretty much across the board you were going to see him fall well short of that polling
which isn't proof of him being screwed.
It's really more a warning about putting too much stock in polls.
Particularly online ones.
Also Paul getting zero votes in some towns is not evidence that he got screwed. This
town Sutton is in Merrimack County and in that county there are a bunch of towns where
Alan Key's got zero votes. Does that mean he was screwed? Even Giuliani and Huckabee
had towns where they got zero votes, but none of that's indicative of votes being stolen.
That 500 votes that Bev brought up weren't uncounted votes. They were just for
candidates who were below the threshold of whatever the outlet she was looking at chose to report.
Alex is pretending they're just mystery votes that probably all say Ron Paul, which is,
you know, they're just refusing to count them. That's a complete fiction. There's no evidence
that slice of the pie chart that Bev brought up was actually Ron Paul. Alex has decided that it is
because that works for him, but there's no basis for this. And God bless it, but Sutton is not a major township. It's
a small town and they made an administrative error reporting the results to the media.
You can see the difference between the way Alex reports this story and the actual details
of what happened. He fudges every bit of information he can so it'll fit the predetermined narrative
which is that the globalist screwed Ron Paul and they caught him red-handed
It's as flimsy as a narrative can get and the real tragedy is that in order to sell this to the audience
you need to demonize innocent bystanders like Jennifer call and
That's just the the cost of doing business for Alex. Yeah. Yeah, it is it is like when you when you work it out
It's like a problem of stakes and of access like if they're
If there was just a way to like contain the damage, you know, like, because there's a certain amount
of this that is like, people are going to gravitate this to this type of thing for fun.
Alex's content. Yeah. Yeah. Even if even if they aren't like obsessed with it and the
number of people who gravitate to it,
whether or not they're there for fun
or for dastardly deeds,
the larger the number, the more power the thing has, right?
So the people who are there for fun
are contributing to that.
It's unfortunate, but that's the case.
In theory, yeah.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
But if we could just get a safe place,
if we could get like a playground for it, you know?
Like if we could get like a football, it you know like if we could get like a a football you know like instead of fighting shitty battles
you know people play football you know like you get one of those for I understand
that you know I think that like okay let's say you can listen to Alex but
then you don't get to have a phone so you can't harass people right that's just
that's trouble that one's trouble that one's gonna be tell and then you can't
have like okay you can do this but you're not allowed to call people. Totally. Because then you're like, okay, that's a conspiracy. Yeah, yeah, yeah. And it's just, there's no way to do it.
Well, it's because I think we all now spend so much time,
and you have to be aware that you're spending time
visiting non-reality.
We're all spending so much time visiting it through
whatever medium we choose to.
And this is one of them that I don't wanna be like,
oh, well, you can't go to non-reality
like that you know that's that's bullshit but at the same time you like you can't bring
non-reality here man that's not where it's supposed to go.
This non-reality when it intersects with reality reality often leads to people getting hurt.
It does.
And that is unfortunate.
Yeah we gotta find a way to.
In a way that a lot of other unreality doesn't like video games totally reality TV or whatever
Yep
So Alex as a guest that he was gonna talk to for longer on this episode
But he got bumped because of the the biggest of the excitement. Yes 31 votes being missing from something right?
This is Armageddon. So this this person gets a short shrift
Now before we go to our guest who is a Vietnam vet himself, he was acting medic there when
their medic got killed in Vietnam.
Had a lot of experience there.
You know I know a lot of middle class people, I even know quite a few wealthy people.
And all the time I hear about their sister, their brother, their cousin or them, their
child falls off a jungle gym in front of 20 witnesses, breaks a finger, falls out of the tree, falls out of the jungle
jam in the backyard or the playhouse, breaks a toe, breaks a foot, my mother broke her
arm, I broke bones falling out of trees, my mother would have been CPS back in the 50s,
gone forever.
And I talked to them, I mean folks here in Austin your child
bruises their eye your child they come to school follow up the skateboard when they're
10 CPS is coming your child tells them I fell off my skateboard they don't care when I dislocated
my shoulder when I was like 12 wrestling in a pool you know chicken fighting on somebody's
shoulders my dad is a dentist oral surgeon he said I'm taking you to Mesquite to go to
the hospital.
Now they're going to ask you how this happened.
Be very careful and tell them that I didn't do this.
I thought, why are you telling me that?
Just give me the hospital.
Sure enough, doctor comes in.
Did your parents do this to you?
And I said, no, it happened in the pool.
How did it happen?
It's a secret police nation of scum.
It's a deeply upsetting story about Alex's dad.
Yeah, I don't want to hear that again.
No, no.
I broke my arm when I was a kid and my parents
are just worried if I was okay,
not about what I would tell the doctor.
It seems like a really messed up thing to do
to a kid to say that,
and it does not make Alex's dad look good.
No, it kind of explains things moving
from that moment forward.
Not to happen.
And then from this moment backward.
Yeah, it's just weird.
It's just very weird headspace.
What a, yeah, I've broken so many bones
through so many different avenues
and at no point in time where my parents ever concerned.
Don't bring me into this.
About, yeah, it was always like,
I mean, at the worst, it was like,
ah, Jesus, who knows if this doctor's any good.
You know, like that was about as bad as it got. Or is going to be expensive. Yeah this is going to be expensive was number
one. Yeah so about everything you can tell that this was a this this guest is going to
be an issue around one of these topics. As it turns out it's a guy named Tom Shefflett
who had his kid taken but then returned almost immediately after they took him to the hospital. So I'm going to shut up now and go to our guest. But his son was hanging on his sister's
car. She drove into the exact same type of things with cousins and people got a little
bruise, CPS comes and they swat team them everything else here to break this down. This
is out of Newcastle, Colorado is the father, Tom Shlett. And Tom, thanks for coming on with us, sir.
You're welcome.
So this is a situation where Tom's 11-year-old son fell after grabbing the handle of a moving
car and hit his head pretty good. Someone in the mobile home park where they lived called
an ambulance and Tom was resistant to their wishes to check the child out.
Sure.
Tom was a medic in the Vietnam War after all,
so his position was that he could be his doctor,
the son's doctor just fine.
His unwillingness to allow the paramedics to check
on his son prompted the Department of Social Services
to do a wellness check because not letting them
examine his son could be a red flag for abuse.
It makes total sense why they could interpret things
this way.
It would almost be negligent not to check.
The social services people were able to briefly examine the child, but when they wanted to
take him to the hospital to get checked out, Tom refused. There were real concerns here.
This kid hit his head. There could be serious trauma that absolutely can't be handled in
a home hospital situation. And here's where things got a little bit out of hand.
Having received a court order, the police police all hazards response team showed up and took
the child into the hospital for testing against the parents' wishes.
That level of forcefulness is a bit much, but you can also understand their reasoning.
If this kid did have brain trauma from the fall and Tom was refusing to get him help,
that's negligent abuse.
Ultimately, they ran tests and found out that the kid was okay, just needed painkillers
and an ice pack.
In the end, that's the best possible outcome. But unfortunately, it also makes the fact
that they did this whole raid thing in order to get the kid help seem pointless. Without
getting the kid checked, there was no way to know if it was okay to assume that the kid
was going to be okay and just needed home care. It's pretty easy to understand the state's
motivation here, but I will grant that it doesn't seem like it was handled the best way it possibly could have.
From the police side, they said that they told him,
they informed him that they had like a warrant
and a court order for the kid to go to the hospital
and he ignored it.
He says that they never told him that they had that,
but I don't know, this guy seems like an asshole.
So I'm not sure I believe his side.
It is a mess and I don't know all the specifics about this situation but you know at the end of the day the kid was
returned after being checked out at the hospital and it's not like there was more
harm done necessarily yeah so Tom he has a bit of a demand for lawmakers sure I
was told that if I did this interview i can have a certain uh...
few minutes here
i want to challenge
uh... the presidential nomadies
all of them
i wanted that if they don't hear this and if they're a team there and there are
committees don't pick up there
that's their fault
but i want to challenge them whoever president, whoever becomes president of this
nation to represent this people and protect this country, I want to stand on my door shaking
my hand telling me that I am going to do everything I can to redress laws that do not protect
you.
And then I'm going to be waiting for that person, that president.
I'm going to be waiting for him to do that. And I want him to know that all America is
going to be watching.
Well, I'll tell you this, we're going to have to do it ourselves, sir. We're going to have
to expose it. And a lot of these social workers are bad.
Well, you guys are the ones that vote for the president. So do it yourself.
Wait, well, that's what we're talking about, sir.
There is no election now.
Nobody's helped me yet. Nobody's helped me yet. It's all stage sir.
It's all stage. But listen, I'm just trying here with you to expose it. It's the exposure
that has the effect and the point is it's been exposed. Yeah. So you kind of get the
sense there maybe Tom's a bit of an asshole. Yeah. Also in the interview he said that he
was previously arrested for assault with a deadly weapon, which may have something to do with the police response. Why? I don't know.
But when Alex says there is telling, he's condescending to this guy about how the presidential
election is all staged. Alex enters his coverage of the election with that conclusion firmly in
mind, so obviously everything he finds is going to be evidence of that staging. The situation in
New Hampshire can't just be an error
because that doesn't comport with the overarching storyline,
which is that everything is staged.
The narrative is set from the jump.
Everything is staged except what Ron Paul does.
Ron Paul is the most popular candidate,
and that scares the globalists.
So all the staging will be done to impede his otherwise inevitable win.
All news is filtered through that lens, and that's how we end up getting here. Yeah. So this guy is not on for very long. But after he leaves, we get another
reframing of the Sutton story. And you can see sort of the tweaks that are going along as Alex
builds the narrative. We get contacted by great listeners at RonPaulWarrior.com. They tell us,
hey, the family voted and then
it showed zero. We went and noticed last night and this morning all these towns, zero, zero,
zero, zero, zero, zero, zero, zero, you'd have 500 votes, 300 votes, 400 votes, thousands
of votes, 3,000 votes. It showed 500 other. Wouldn't say who it was. Definitely Paul and
Obama. 200 other, 400 other, 600 other four hundred other six hundred other two hundred other
hundred other fifty other
daylight calm and we call that there is called right before our time
the first town she calls
they say all the other was a mistake he got thirty one
we're gonna change that in all the the maps, that suddenly changes. What about the
other towns?" So there's some very important tweaks that Alex has made to this story as he works on
it in preparation to take some more calls. The first is incorporating the idea that Bev brought
up about the votes listed as other. She gave an infantile misrepresentation of that and now Alex
has woven it into his review of all these towns in New Hampshire. All these places with all these votes for other. Those are
definitely Ron Paul in the GOP primary and Obama in the Democrat one. Obama he
doesn't really actually like or anything he's just it's sort of yeah it's the
cudgel that he uses from the other side. January 2008 is a great time for a
racist to call everybody else racist. It was the best.
I don't think that's the case for Alex.
I think he just hates Hillary.
Oh, no, no, I know.
But I mean, that's what that's kind of what I'm saying is like that because you can be like,
oh, yeah, I hate Hillary so much, I can passively come off as supporting a black candidate for president.
I'm amazing.
Sure.
I'm the least racist person ever.
So the second misrepresentation in there is that Sutton was the first town that Bev called
It's not so much as to as the first it's just that it's the only town they called because it's the only one where this error happened
You may notice that there isn't a second town that's been contacted where Paul got screwed
Which should be so easy to find if what Alex is saying is true
That's because all of this, everything that Bev and Alex are doing in this episode is
in service of turning this very small administrative error into proof of statewide and honestly
national voter fraud meant to take out Ron Paul.
It's a desperate charade and the evidence they're presenting is weak.
It is weak and that's why you need to keep building on other layers of this conspiracy, other
other side support.
So let's say we've got Sutton had 900 total votes odd, something like that, right?
So adult population wise, let's call it a town of 3000.
Let's just do that.
It's about 2000.
Whatever.
Let's do that.
So if we spread that out, total population of the United States call every
town roughly that divide by the number of people. There should be several hundred thousand
towns where you can find 31 votes missing. Uh huh. Yeah. Well, it shouldn't be hard.
Oh yeah. But I mean look sure. But the New Hampshire primaries the only one that's happened other than the Iowa caucus
So at this point you only have that state
But there are plenty of places that Alex has said that there were zero votes for on Paul
So all of those you should be able to buy this point Bev's been off the air for a while
You should have dug up another one well, but even then New Hampshire is even okay, so fine New Hampshire is a small state
But there's 31 votes is a small number of votes compared to a large state, you know state
Well, even a small let's let's be also clear. Yeah, you don't even need to find 31
You need to find one and Alex hasn't done that is true. So here we are
Well, I mean, you know, you could find five or seven that'll must be less suspicious totally
so
Alex I found this very strange. He starts covering
a news story, but it's an Info Wars article about the interview he did earlier in this
episode. With Beth. Yes. Vote fraud expert, Bev Harris contacted the head clerk in Sutton,
Jennifer Call, who was forced to admit that they had reported zero. See, they did report
zero. We need to add that by the way. Who was forced to admit that 31 votes for Ron Paul were completely omitted
from the final report sheet claiming human error was responsible for the mistake and
it was all over the state too, wasn't it? Was it? I mean, he get 25% in a few areas,
30% in a few. That's where they didn't have to fix him. Two or three votes not counted
could be a plausible mistake, but 31 votes
for one candidate and showing zero. The classic method for rigging a hand count is to write
the wrong number on the form Harris called Alex Jones showed. They are continuing everything,
they're counting everything in public real nice, but fill out a form in public real nice
and then they transfer it to another form and they call that a summary sheet And then that is the one they send in. So you have a showing 31
votes. I don't believe that was probably probably a 50%. And then magically it's so
magically it's zero explained Harris. Hey dude, we heard it. It was earlier on this show.
Yeah. What are you doing? Yeah, those quotes from Bev are from this episode.
That's fucking.
It's almost like you're high.
That is classic.
I'm hallucinating.
Like straight up, this stack is small, make some copies.
All right.
Like, okay.
Well, here's what we've got for proof.
We've got a recording of this conversation.
No, no, no, you're wrong.
We have a recording and a transcript of that recording.
We have two things.
Now you say there's only one thing,
but you have mistaken that,
because now we have a recording and a transcript
and us talking about it, that's three things.
That's a second hand source.
Holy shit.
You remember this, see, look at us,
we've got so much evidence.
I have buried in evidence here.
Of preponderance of evidence, if you will.
Yeah, I mean, I understand.
That's how we got to the Iraq War.
That's honestly exactly the motivation
behind what Alex is doing.
Creating the appearance of this large amount of evidence
when there's nothing.
There's nothing happening here.
You're full of shit.
So I think that maybe there are some Ron Paul supporters
who think Alex is an asshole.
And I think that some of them
rightly yeah, think that he gives Ron Paul a bad name now Ron Paul also gives himself a bad name
He's doing a Lord's job, but Alex still makes him look crazy
Sure, and I think that Alex is not appreciative that some of these websites say that he's a little much. Oh, yeah
I got emails people thinking I'm arrogant,
or Daily Paul has big discussions about am I arrogant?
I'm upset.
I'm in like, pick up, you know, chairs and throw them through window mode.
I take it real serious when criminals are stealing our elections.
And you hear me get up there and you think I'm putting on a macho man Randy Savage act.
This is how I actually feel. Okay?
Okay, I'm mad. Okay. I'm you should be mad too. Yeah, hear me daily Paul
I think I think what is funny about that is that that's one of the few times that I that Alex has said something that I've
Directly like yeah, I know how you feel buddy. Hmm when people are like you should calm down
like, yeah, I know how you feel, buddy. Hmm.
When people are like, you should calm down.
Yeah, it's like, hey, listen, Alex is full of shit.
Unfortunately, this is who I am.
I am so sorry.
I apologize to all of you.
I, I, I disagree though, because I think that you actually
are what you are.
Whereas Alex is obviously putting on an act.
Right.
He's putting on bullshit.
And I like, I, I, so often I'm just like, God, guys,
you are way last.
You're way behind in the line for wish and I was different.
Don't you worry about that.
Right.
We're missing the forest for the trees here though.
Right, right, right.
And that is that Ron Paul, Daily Paul,
they're talking shit about Alex.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
Saying he's irrational of putting one on.
And I
was surprised by this. Yeah. Because I you know you think that
you know Alex has Ron Paul on the show pretty consistently.
They're pretty connected. Alex even started standing his son.
Yeah. So like, you forget that there's probably some division
in the ranks. There is this part of the Ron Paul base. It's like
Alex sucks. And this is what makes Alex really mad. And so when he comes back from break,
he descends into a bit of a tirade.
You got mob bosses, like literally his dad and his uncle, both mob bosses, time for armed
robbery, made men, Giuliani.
Trump's lawyer.
You got mob bosses ready for president now
we are ruled by scum
and i am you understand how dangerous this is
the people running things of the grand sons and sons of people to kill two
hundred mill
they don't play games
they're coming for you and your family
well it's a little extreme. He gets a little upset.
He goes, what are we supposed to do? It's the fact that we're not upset that this stuff
hasn't changed. I am getting mad. Hold on. I just started thinking about it. They're
all mob bosses, they're coke dealers, they're Chinese generals, they're espionage, they're
deputy directors of the CIA and they're poisoning this and going after our guns and grabbing our kids and just having their way with us.
You got this cowardly chicken neck public trained to just go along with all of it.
And then you got Ron Paul all over New Hampshire.
It was last night, it was 0000, look, thousands of votes, hundreds of votes in these towns,
0000, 0000, 0000, 0000 for Ron Paul. That ain't happening. That's bull. Period.
It means we're in a dictatorship if they get away with this.
A dictatorship of a bunch of arrogant criminals that need to be defeated.
You understand it's either us or them. You understand with a historical paradigm that if they continue to grow
and they continue to expand their operation, it's going to get really bad.
My back's against the wall. I just happened to know it.
You haven't figured it out yet. And I pray every day you'll figure out
that your back is against the wall. These criminals have gotten high tech.
They're building high tech control
grids all around us to micromanagers and controllers because they got such bad stuff playing for
us. They know we're going to go absolutely ape. We got to go ape before they're done
putting the grid in. I'm not risking my life to play tiddlywinks. I'm not on this show to play games with you. Do you understand me?
It is a...
It's gonna be okay, bud.
No, he's not. He's not. The Ron Paul, the Daily Paul, has said he's too much.
And he must demonstrate that I am not too much by being too much.
Yeah, yeah. And he must demonstrate that I am not too much by being too much. Yeah. Yeah
So that's the kind of 2008 level freak out though
It's interesting because he almost goes into like breathing exercises. Yeah, instead of storming offset or yeah
swearing or anything he just he's
He's like the Hulk trying to soothe himself
There is there is a level of of like you did actually make yourself mad.
But you don't realize that it's not because of the globalists.
It's because somebody was mean to you.
At least you think they were.
Yes, whatever it is, it's you, it's in your head
and you're making your own problems.
Right, right, right, right, yeah, yeah, yeah.
So Alex keeps ranting a little bit
after he captures his breath. Sure. And he descends into a little bit of fantasies
of violence about the chicken next that's nice and then there's breaking news
oh okay and don't think if ron paul loses and gets cheated that we lose we're
showing everybody the fraud we're educating everybody we're growing our
movement chicken necks and we're that much closer to getting our hands around
your throat you understand me because there's some of us that love life and are willing to fight for it.
And there's some of us that haven't been domesticated.
And there's some of us that knew an enemy.
An enemy is somebody who's out to get you folks and there's a lot of people out to get
us and I take this deadly serious.
That's why I get so mad.
It's very real for me.
And even if you don't know how real it is, it's still real.
Just like you don't know a bus is coming 60 miles an hour down the road.
But nevertheless, it's coming.
Why don't you turn around and see it coming so you can step out of the way?
New developments?
What is going on here?
9-11, 9-11, 9.11, 3 counties.
He got 9.11 in 3 counties.
They throw it in our face, don't they?
I'm sorry, what?
Those little numeral- they love-
Hold on.
...the numeral of numerality.
No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no,
no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no,
no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no,
no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no,
no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no,
no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no Are you telling me that somebody is saying that he got 9.11 votes? Yeah in three
9.11% of the vote right yeah, right three of the towns of
200 something towns. Oh for God's sake
All right now here's what you be gone
Here's what's great about this clip is that it also included Alex saying I take this deadly series. I love it
I love it. Oh my god to throwing it in our face with these numbers.
I mean the man, the man just hears 9 11 9 11 9 11. Mm-hmm. Mm-hmm. I mean, you know, it's just it's
it's it makes you sad. It makes you sad how obvious they are. Right. You know, it's it's they're
laughing at you. It's in your face. It's like they make me feel so small right and they are real
It's definitely not in my own head. Yeah, I mean there are probably places he got 6.9 percent
Yeah for 20 percent right definitely some of those
3.11 just to make Alex mad because he hates 311 311. Hey
Again, I agree with him 7.11. That's
promotional. That was paid for by 711. Well, that's actually a reference to
Zach Alfenakis's joke about terrorists who, yeah, they mistook that. See, they
mixed up their nines and their sevens. Sure. So Bev does come back and it's
uneventful. She doesn't have anything else She doesn't have any breaking news that she got from fucking Sutton 2. No
No, there's Sutton 2 Furious. There is no second Sutton.
Hmm. And really the rest of anything is just kind of like a repetition of these
themes that have already been developed. Yeah. So you may as well just jump off here.
It's as good a point as any to leave as the the 9-11 numerology votes
I I appreciate that not only did they
Do a thing then write a thing about the thing then read the thing on the air about the thing that they did that is pretty
Remarkable that's that speed. I'll give them that but then to have them back on to redo the thing that they already did
that they rewrote that then they talked about on the thing that then they
talked about again on the thing well here's what here's where it's a little
bit less impressive okay Paul Joseph Watson wrote that article so like it
was somebody else third party for them I imagine Alex was typing yeah I would
like to see that that would like Alex during the breaks to be
More respect from me infinitely more respect if he's writing articles in five minutes in between the yeah, yeah
so
You know I
Was doing the show preps and I think you can probably agree this wouldn't have been the best as a live episode
But it is something that I didn't want to let get in the shuffle. No, I agree. There is something really remarkable about how little evidence Alex requires to write
a grand story about voter fraud.
And it's been that way for a long time.
Like the 2020 election is no anomaly for him.
No.
It's just that everyone else is taking this more seriously and the candidate is unhinged
enough to play
into all of these conspiracies and cater to that community.
So we're left in a far more precarious situation.
If Ron Paul, well, there's a lot of ifs there.
If Ron Paul had the level of support that Trump has and played along with Alex's games
and these kinds of voter fraud things, we might have been in a much different situation earlier on in the country.
I think one of the most interesting things about Alex on today's episode is that he said
something that contradicts everything he said, which is like, we have to deal with this now,
you know, before.
Because he's, we're, we're so often- We have to go ape now before.
Yeah, we're so often obsessed with like,
when does the shooting start?
You know, he gets those calls all the time now,
when does the shooting start?
And Alex has inadvertently revealed something
that is true, which is that if anything,
if any of what he said is true,
then you should go ape before shit starts going off.
Right.
Because once shit starts going off, it's too late.
Well, I mean, it's the entire premise
of the idea of the prison planet,
is the reason you don't want a one-world government
is because there's nowhere else to go then.
You got it.
So you have to destroy the one-world government
before it happens, and you end up in a prison planet
where you can't stop it.
And yeah, I mean, that is underneath all of Alex's rhetoric,
but the conclusion that you draw from it,
this idea that like you gotta start shooting before before it's too late is an unfortunate parallel. It is underneath
what Alex is talking about, but it's the part of it that you never talk about.
Right. I mean, because what Alex, realistically, what Alex should be doing if you're Alex,
trying to believe what you believe and still exist in reality is be like guys if we behave extreme now before violence kicks off if we don't be violent
but we still do the stuff you know then we cannot be violent if we react strong
and handle the problem now before it gets out of control then we don't have
to do violence instead he's just like listen, they're gonna get us to the point
where we get to do some violence.
So let's just hang back.
Sooner or later, somebody will pull the trigger
and then we get to go wipe shit.
Well, I think that's what a lot of people
in the audience are probably subconsciously
or consciously drawn towards.
And that's what Trump is.
Trump is the, hey, now we get to shoot.
That's the idea.
Maybe, hopefully not.
So, you know, you get this glimpse here
that there's a consistency in terms of this.
My person is more popular and the only reason
that reality doesn't reflect that
is because someone's stealing it and they're
cheating and rigging. So anyway, we'll be back for another episode, but until then,
we have a website. And do we do it's KnowledgeFight.com. Yep, we're also on
Blue Sky. We are on Blue Sky. It's Knowledge Fight. Yep, we'll be back. But until then,
I'm Neo, Leo, I'm DZX Clark. When I get to this point, I always realize that
there's something that I could have done. And in this point, I could have found what the number one song
on the Billboard charts was on this day in history and then boop boop boop it.
That would be great.
But I didn't do that.
Maybe next time.
Woo yeah woo yeah woo!
And now here comes the sex robot.
Andy and Kansas, you're on the air. Thanks for holding.
Hello, Alex. I'm a first-time caller. I'm a huge fan. I love your work.
I love you.